2022
DOI: 10.5603/dk.a2022.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diabetic distress and work-related stress among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Abstract: This article has been peer reviewed and published immediately upon acceptance.It is an open access article, which means that it can be downloaded, printed, and distributed freely, provided the work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pooled prevalence of 33% indicates that DD is highly prevalent and suggests that a significant proportion of individuals with T2DM in India experience diabetes-related psychological distress yet remains an under-recognized issue in the context of diabetes care. Our study findings is consistent with previous studies conducted in similar settings and reinforces the consistent presence of DD as a critical aspect of T2DM management in India (Gahlan et al, 2018 ; Gupta et al, 2022 ; Natesan et al, 2016 ; Panda et al, 2022 ; Patra et al, 2021 ; Roy et al, 2018 ; Sumana et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pooled prevalence of 33% indicates that DD is highly prevalent and suggests that a significant proportion of individuals with T2DM in India experience diabetes-related psychological distress yet remains an under-recognized issue in the context of diabetes care. Our study findings is consistent with previous studies conducted in similar settings and reinforces the consistent presence of DD as a critical aspect of T2DM management in India (Gahlan et al, 2018 ; Gupta et al, 2022 ; Natesan et al, 2016 ; Panda et al, 2022 ; Patra et al, 2021 ; Roy et al, 2018 ; Sumana et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…36 records were excluded because of the reasons such as the study is not measuring DD, not done on T2DM, data not clear. After full-text screening 13 articles were identified for data extraction, from which only 10 articles’ data was obtained (Gahlan et al, 2018 ; Gupta et al, 2022 ; Natesan et al, 2016 ; Panda et al, 2022 ; Patra et al, 2021 ; Ratnesh et al, 2020 ; Roy et al, 2018 ; Sasi et al, 2013 ; Sumana et al, 2021 ; Vidya et al, 2021 ). 3 articles were excluded from data analysis as they reported DD and other kinds of depression together.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%