2015
DOI: 10.1111/dme.12836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diabetes telemonitoring reduces the risk of hypoglycaemia during Ramadan: a pilot randomized controlled study

Abstract: The results of this study reinforce the need for monitoring as well as educational initiatives for Muslims with diabetes who fast during Ramadan. Telemonitoring offers an attractive option requiring further research. (Clinical Trial Registry No. NCT02189135).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from the group discussions echo previous findings related to the interface between formal care, the impact of the family and the community, beliefs and perceptions regarding fasting, religious influence, and managing blood glucose during Ramadan (Almansour et al, ; Gaborit et al, ; Lee et al, , ; Mygind, Kristiansen, Wittrup, & Nørgaard, ; Patel et al, ; Peterson et al, ). People with diabetes have been shown to fast despite their HCP advising against the practice (Chowdhury, Khan, Lasker, & Choudhary, ), and this was confirmed by the workshop participants when relating their experiences prior to DAFNE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The results from the group discussions echo previous findings related to the interface between formal care, the impact of the family and the community, beliefs and perceptions regarding fasting, religious influence, and managing blood glucose during Ramadan (Almansour et al, ; Gaborit et al, ; Lee et al, , ; Mygind, Kristiansen, Wittrup, & Nørgaard, ; Patel et al, ; Peterson et al, ). People with diabetes have been shown to fast despite their HCP advising against the practice (Chowdhury, Khan, Lasker, & Choudhary, ), and this was confirmed by the workshop participants when relating their experiences prior to DAFNE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) showed that tight glycemic control reduces the risk of complications and progression of microvascular complications (nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy) in patients with type 1 diabetes (The Diabetes Control Complications Trial Research Group, 1993). The use of technological innovation in routine practice represents an attractive option for improving outcomes in these patients as several studies have demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of using telemedicine (Farmer et al, 2005; Charpentier et al, 2011; Lee et al, 2015, 2016) in diabetes management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The included participants were patients with diabetes who fasted for at least 10 days during Ramadan of 20146610 patients with diabetes—6350 T2D patients and 260 T1D patientsNMBefore Ramadan, approximately 48% of participants received Ramadan-specific diabetes education and nearly 66% patients were recommended to alter their medications timing and dosage, while about 70% received dietary advice. Receiving Ramadan-specific diabetes education helped participants to follow Ramadan-specific diabetes management recommendations during Ramadan better than those who did not receive such educationLee et al [37]MalaysiaA pilot randomized controlled study to evaluate the short-term benefits of a telemonitoring-supplemented focused diabetic education compared with education alone in participants with T2D who were fasting during RamadanRandom selection from five primary health care provider practices to telemonitoring group (TG) or a usual care group (UC)37 T2D patients: in the tele-monitoring group ( n  = 18) who received goal-setting and personalized feedback and 19 T2D patients receiving Ramadan-focused pre-education only, i.e., usual careNMThe TG experienced fewer hypoglycemia symptoms compared to the UC during the study period (88 vs. 157 episodes), (OR 0.1273; 95% CI 0.0267–0.6059, p  > 0.01) (effect size = −1.14*). However, there was no significant difference observed in glycemic control at the end of study between the two groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%