2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-5221-0_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diabetes Mellitus Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning Classifiers and Techniques Using the Concept of Data Augmentation and Sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results obtained indicate that using neural network-based deep learning techniques in computational biology domains produced high prediction accuracy with reliability, thus making computational biology and biomedicine-based decisions dependent on such predictive modeling techniques. Similar use of machine learning techniques for the prediction of Diabetes Mellitus Disease with feature augmentation and oversampling techniques [14] showed high prediction accuracy performance in two distinct datasets for classifiers such as random forest (RF), light gradient boosting (LGB) and gradient boosting (GB). Prediction accuracy scores obtained were 98.99% for LGB, 96.6% for RF and 97.64% for GB.…”
Section: Related Research Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results obtained indicate that using neural network-based deep learning techniques in computational biology domains produced high prediction accuracy with reliability, thus making computational biology and biomedicine-based decisions dependent on such predictive modeling techniques. Similar use of machine learning techniques for the prediction of Diabetes Mellitus Disease with feature augmentation and oversampling techniques [14] showed high prediction accuracy performance in two distinct datasets for classifiers such as random forest (RF), light gradient boosting (LGB) and gradient boosting (GB). Prediction accuracy scores obtained were 98.99% for LGB, 96.6% for RF and 97.64% for GB.…”
Section: Related Research Workmentioning
confidence: 99%