2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2019.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diabetes does not increase infection risk or mortality following an infection in patients with cirrhosis and ascites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A prospective case control study on a database of 3 randomized controlled multicentric trials investigating the efficacy of satavaptan in treating ascites compared the risk of infections and mortality following an infection between patients with LC, with or without DM. The study had conflicting results: DM did not increase the HR of infections or the mortality following an infection in any of the diabetic patients receiving different associated treatments: diuretics, quinolones, proton pump inhibitors, lactulose, and non-selective beta-blockers [ 31 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A prospective case control study on a database of 3 randomized controlled multicentric trials investigating the efficacy of satavaptan in treating ascites compared the risk of infections and mortality following an infection between patients with LC, with or without DM. The study had conflicting results: DM did not increase the HR of infections or the mortality following an infection in any of the diabetic patients receiving different associated treatments: diuretics, quinolones, proton pump inhibitors, lactulose, and non-selective beta-blockers [ 31 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al, 2019 showed that T2DM patients had a higher cumulative incidence of PLA than controls (0.87% vs. 0.30%), DM being associated with increased hazard of PLA (HR = 2.88) [ 30 ]. In contrast, Bossen L. et al 2019, found no association between DM and risk of infection in patients with LC and ascites treated with satavaptan [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bossen et al took the advantage of 3 cohorts of patients (n = 1,198) with cirrhosis and ascites, included in 3 randomized controlled trials assessing satavaptan in the treatment of ascites, to explore this question. 12 They observed that patients with diabetes did not have an increased rate of infection or death after an infection compared to those without. This seems to be true for different severity stages of diabetes.…”
Section: Cirrhosismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…28 In contrast, in decompensated cirrhosis, diabetes does not increase the risk of infection. 29 Patients with decompensated cirrhosis are particularly vulnerable to developing sarcopenia due to impaired oral intake and increased gluconeogenesis from skeletal muscle protein. Frailty and sarcopenia are currently considered to be independent predictors of mortality in decompensated cirrhosis, but it remains unknown whether they are predisposing factors in the transition to decompensated cirrhosis.…”
Section: Predisposing Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%