2014
DOI: 10.1111/dme.12437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diabetes autoantibodies do not predict progression to diabetes in adults: the Diabetes Prevention Program

Abstract: Aims To determine if the presence of diabetes autoantibodies predicts the development of diabetes among participants in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Methods A total of 3050 participants were randomized into three treatment groups: intensive lifestyle intervention, metformin and placebo. Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) 65 autoantibodies and insulinoma-associated-2 autoantibodies were measured at baseline and participants were followed for 3.2 years for the development of diabetes. Results The overall … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In favour of general screening of adult patients with diabetes, patients with Type 2 and LADA cannot be identified by any single clinical feature short of diabetic ketoacidosis. However, the data are conflicting regarding the predictive value of GADA positivity for incident diabetes [14,38,[68][69][70][71].…”
Section: Clinical Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In favour of general screening of adult patients with diabetes, patients with Type 2 and LADA cannot be identified by any single clinical feature short of diabetic ketoacidosis. However, the data are conflicting regarding the predictive value of GADA positivity for incident diabetes [14,38,[68][69][70][71].…”
Section: Clinical Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A null association between GAD65 antibodies and development of type 2 diabetes reported in Northern Italy may reflect the small size of this study, which was underpowered to detect a true association [18]. The Diabetes Prevention Program also reported no association between GAD65 antibodies and development of type 2 diabetes [19]. However, the follow-up of the Diabetes Prevention Program cohort was very short (3.2 years) and included individuals of various ethnicities with different risks of diabetes, both of which may explain the null overall association.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In contrast, there are only a few population-based prospective studies exploring the association between autoimmunity and incident diabetes. Moreover, while some of these studies reported an association [15,16], others have been inconclusive [17][18][19]. In a recent meta-analysis Koopman et al reported that the pooled risk estimate of incident type 2 diabetes for GAD65 antibody positivity, compared with GAD65 antibody negativity, was 3.36 (95% CI 1.9, 5.9) [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B cells can promote IR in humans and mice through modulating T cell function [30, 35], including the ability of B cells to support human Th17 function through contact-dependent mechanisms [30]. B cells also promote IR by shifting to a pro-inflammatory cytokine profile [30, 94] and by secreting autoantibodies [35], although a relationship between putative diabetogenic autoantibodies and adult-T2D progression is not established [95]. Obesity-associated increases in serum IgG only in children [96] and younger mice [35] further question the role of antibodies in adult disease.…”
Section: Lymphocytes As Sources Of Obesity/t2d–associated Inflammamentioning
confidence: 99%