2004
DOI: 10.1002/oa.716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dia Shoma (Mali), a medieval cemetery in the inner Niger delta

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to compare burial typology from Dia Shoma medieval cemetery (Mali) with previously documented funerary practices of the inner Niger delta in order to expand our knowledge of the mortuary rituals once practised in this region. Considering archaeological resources from an anthropological viewpoint provides us with new information about human migration, settlement, cultural affiliation and way of life. From this point of view, especially for the period between 800 and 1000 AD, Dia Shoma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Translations of their publications, or primary publications in English, have historically been scarce, however they are increasingly appearing (Murail et al, 2004;Nilsson Stutz, 2003a, 2003bPautreau et al, 2004;Peressinotto et al, 2004;Roksandic et al, 2006;Valentin et al, 2000;Zeitoun et al, 2004). Roksandic (2002) published an English-language review of the method and in 2006 Henri Duday published two book chapters in English, one of which is a translation by Christopher Knü sel and largely reiterates the key information in his 1990 article (Duday, 2006) and the second (Duday and Guillon, 2006) expands more on the techniques for field recording.…”
Section: Field Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Translations of their publications, or primary publications in English, have historically been scarce, however they are increasingly appearing (Murail et al, 2004;Nilsson Stutz, 2003a, 2003bPautreau et al, 2004;Peressinotto et al, 2004;Roksandic et al, 2006;Valentin et al, 2000;Zeitoun et al, 2004). Roksandic (2002) published an English-language review of the method and in 2006 Henri Duday published two book chapters in English, one of which is a translation by Christopher Knü sel and largely reiterates the key information in his 1990 article (Duday, 2006) and the second (Duday and Guillon, 2006) expands more on the techniques for field recording.…”
Section: Field Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although this method has revolutionized the approach to mortuary contexts in French archaeology, until 2000 its influence beyond the French speaking world was limited by a lack of publications in English (Knudson and Stojanowski 2008). Since then, however, it has been described in several English papers (Murail et al 2004;Peressinotto et al 2004;Zeytoun et al 2004) and adopted more widely (e.g., Rockandic 2002;Nilsson Stutz 2003;Willis and Tayles 2009; Knü sel 2014). Relatively few English-language publications have described the approach in detail, however (Duday and Guillon 2006;Duday 2009).…”
Section: Archaeothanatology: An Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%