2019
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dhaka: variational autoencoder for unmasking tumor heterogeneity from single cell genomic data

Abstract: Intra-tumor heterogeneity is one of the key confounding factors in deciphering tumor evolution. Malignant cells exhibit variations in their gene expression, copy numbers, and mutation even when originating from a single progenitor cell. Single cell sequencing of tumor cells has recently emerged as a viable option for unmasking the underlying tumor heterogeneity. However extracting features from single cell genomic data in order to infer their evolutionary trajectory remains computationally challenging due to t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adversarial component in Cell BLAST enables a free form of variational posterior distribution, which could be learned from data directly. In contrast, the canonical variational autoencoder model used by scVI and several other tools 11,[25][26][27] enforces Gaussian distribution (with diagonal-covariance matrices) for the variational posterior. Since the variational posterior is sufficiently accurate and efficient to sample from, the Cell BLAST model offers a unique opportunity of utilizing the posterior distribution for an improved, manifold-aware cell-to-cell similarity metric (NPD, see Supplementary Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adversarial component in Cell BLAST enables a free form of variational posterior distribution, which could be learned from data directly. In contrast, the canonical variational autoencoder model used by scVI and several other tools 11,[25][26][27] enforces Gaussian distribution (with diagonal-covariance matrices) for the variational posterior. Since the variational posterior is sufficiently accurate and efficient to sample from, the Cell BLAST model offers a unique opportunity of utilizing the posterior distribution for an improved, manifold-aware cell-to-cell similarity metric (NPD, see Supplementary Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UMAP 51 and scPhere 35 were performed using Python package umaplearn (v0.3.8) and scPhere (v0.1.0), respectively. ZIFA 52 (v0.1), Dhaka 26 (v0.1), DCA 7 (v0.2.2), scVI 11 (v0.2.3), scScope 53 (v0.1.5), and SAUCIE 54 source code were downloaded from their Github repositories. For ZIFA and scScope, we removed hard-coded random seeds and added options for manually setting them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of DGMs to scRNA‐seq data emerged as a useful way to embed and analyze cells in a low‐dimensional space that summarizes their transcriptomes. Here, the distances between cells in the embedding space can be used to identify phenotypically coherent groups of cells, reflecting either discrete cell types (e.g., T cells, B cells), hierarchies of types (e.g., subtypes of T cells), or variation along some continuum (e.g., progression along the cell cycle) (Ding et al , ; Lopez et al , 2018a; Wang & Gu, ; Amodio et al , ; Eraslan et al , 2019b; Rashid et al , ; Grønbech et al , ). For example, scvis (Ding et al , ) employs a VAE to learn a biologically meaningful two‐dimensional representation of single cells from oligodendroglioma samples.…”
Section: Applications To Molecular Biology and Biomedical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through combing high-throughput cell line assays of drug-induced transcriptomic perturbation effects, the drug response variational autoencoder (Dr.VAE) has been developed to improve drug response prediction [41]. Rashid et al have well applied VAE to unmask tumor heterogeneity from single cell genomic data [42]. Further, Tezcan et al have succeeded in reconstructing magnetic resonance (MR) images from under-sampled measurements with VAE [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%