2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2021.107907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DGAs with polynomial homology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…\end{equation*}$$Precomposing with this automorphism, the action of the second factor of Λdouble-struckFp(z1)Λdouble-struckFp(z1)$\Lambda _{\mathbb {F}_p}({z_{-1}}) \otimes \Lambda _{\mathbb {F}_p}({z_{-1}})$ on Λdouble-struckFp(z1)$\Lambda _{\mathbb {F}_p}({z_{-1}})$ becomes trivial, that is, this action is the one obtained by the augmentation map of Λdouble-struckFp(z1)$\Lambda _{\mathbb {F}_p}({z_{-1}})$. Using the Künneth formula [3, eq. (2)], we obtain the following: E2sans-serifTornormalΛFpfalse(z1false)normalΛFp(z1)opfalse(Λdouble-struckFp(z1),Λdouble-struckFp(z1)false)newline≅sans-serifTornormalΛFpfalse(z1false)false(Λdouble-struckFp(z1),Λdouble-struckFp(z1)false)sans-serifTornormalΛ…”
Section: Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…\end{equation*}$$Precomposing with this automorphism, the action of the second factor of Λdouble-struckFp(z1)Λdouble-struckFp(z1)$\Lambda _{\mathbb {F}_p}({z_{-1}}) \otimes \Lambda _{\mathbb {F}_p}({z_{-1}})$ on Λdouble-struckFp(z1)$\Lambda _{\mathbb {F}_p}({z_{-1}})$ becomes trivial, that is, this action is the one obtained by the augmentation map of Λdouble-struckFp(z1)$\Lambda _{\mathbb {F}_p}({z_{-1}})$. Using the Künneth formula [3, eq. (2)], we obtain the following: E2sans-serifTornormalΛFpfalse(z1false)normalΛFp(z1)opfalse(Λdouble-struckFp(z1),Λdouble-struckFp(z1)false)newline≅sans-serifTornormalΛFpfalse(z1false)false(Λdouble-struckFp(z1),Λdouble-struckFp(z1)false)sans-serifTornormalΛ…”
Section: Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark In [3, proof of Theorem 1.6], the first author shows that every double-struckFp$\mathbb {F}_p$‐DGA with homology Λdouble-struckFp(z1)$\Lambda _{\mathbb {F}_p}(z_{-1})$ is formal as a DGA. However, we need a slightly stronger result.…”
Section: Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 / 2 D 2 1 ˝F2 1. However, there is no element in H F 2 H Z˝F 2 H F 2 Y that squares to 2 1 ˝F2 1. Since this does not use Dyer-Lashof operations, this argument at p D 2 also works for DGAs and H Z-algebras and provides a proof of Theorem 1.8.…”
Section: E -Infinity F P -Dgas Are Not Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%