2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2021.113296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DFT, NBO, HOMO-LUMO, NCI, stability, Fukui function and hole – Electron analyses of tolcapone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural bond order (NBO) analysis is known for describing phenomena involving electron density transfer, such as intermolecular forces , and interactions between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), , which are related to stabilization energy ( E (2)), estimated by the second-order perturbative approach E ( 2 ) = q i false[ F ( i , j ) false] 2 ε j ε i in which q i is the occupancy of the bond orbital, ε j and ε i are the energies of the natural orbitals (acceptor and donor, respectively), and F ( i , j ) is the Fock operator. An NBO analysis was done for the frontier orbital interactions in the transition states (TSs), using NBO 3.1 software (included in Gaussian 09 software). Atomic partial charges were calculated using different models: Mulliken (MPA), charges from electrostatic potentials using a grid-based method (CHELPG), Hirshfeld (HPA), its improvement, proposed by Marenich et al (called CM5), and natural charges (NPA) at the ωB97X-D/6-31G(d,p)-LANL2DZ-PCM level (water and acetonitrile solvents).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Natural bond order (NBO) analysis is known for describing phenomena involving electron density transfer, such as intermolecular forces , and interactions between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), , which are related to stabilization energy ( E (2)), estimated by the second-order perturbative approach E ( 2 ) = q i false[ F ( i , j ) false] 2 ε j ε i in which q i is the occupancy of the bond orbital, ε j and ε i are the energies of the natural orbitals (acceptor and donor, respectively), and F ( i , j ) is the Fock operator. An NBO analysis was done for the frontier orbital interactions in the transition states (TSs), using NBO 3.1 software (included in Gaussian 09 software). Atomic partial charges were calculated using different models: Mulliken (MPA), charges from electrostatic potentials using a grid-based method (CHELPG), Hirshfeld (HPA), its improvement, proposed by Marenich et al (called CM5), and natural charges (NPA) at the ωB97X-D/6-31G(d,p)-LANL2DZ-PCM level (water and acetonitrile solvents).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural bond order (NBO) analysis is known for describing phenomena involving electron density transfer, such as intermolecular forces 20 , 21 and interactions between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), 22 , 23 which are related to stabilization energy ( E (2)), estimated by the second-order perturbative approach in which q i is the occupancy of the bond orbital, ε j and ε i are the energies of the natural orbitals (acceptor and donor, respectively), and F ( i , j ) is the Fock operator. 24 28 An NBO analysis was done for the frontier orbital interactions in the transition states (TSs), using NBO 3.1 software 29 (included in Gaussian 09 software 30 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NBO calculations were conducted using NBO 3.1 module embedded in Gaussian09W (Bassey et al, 2022). Highest occupied and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO and LUMO) isosurface maps were plotted using Multiwfn 3.7 dev software (Isravel et al, 2021). Origin 8.0 Pro was used for charge analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e figure shows a high degree of overlap between holes and electrons in the ligand as they widely spread over the entire molecule specifically on O and N (of the isoxazole ring), S (thiophene ring), and N (azomethine bond), respectively. By combining hole-electron maps and the indices, it can be deduced that the ligand excitation S 0 ⟶ S 1 may be regarded as a CT excitation characterized by large values of S r (0.759 Å) and D index (0.360 Å) [76] as reported in Table 8.…”
Section: Electron Excitation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%