2003
DOI: 10.1002/qsar.200330828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DFT Based Atomic Softness and Its Application in Site Selectivity

Abstract: Active site of a complex molecule and mechanism of chemical reaction has been studied with the help of atomic softness values derived from calculation based on Density functional theory. The quantum mechanical equation of Klopman has been solved with the help of AM1 calculation by using Win MOPAC7.21 software. On the basis of chemical potential equalization principle, and Koopmans theorem for frontier orbitals a formalism has been developed for the calculation of electron affinity of an atom in a molecule EA. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well established that the stability of the compound formed between nucleophile and electrophile depends upon the value of difference between softness values of E ‡ m of nucleophile and softness values of E ‡ n of electrophile, ∆E ‡ nm represent the difference. The higher is the ∆E ‡ nm (∆E ‡ nm = | E ‡ n-E ‡ m |) greater is the stability of the compound [22][23][24] . ∆E ‡ nm values, when the compounds treated as nucleophile and receptor amino acids (Asn-Y182, Tyr-Y183 and Glu-Y186) as electrophile, have shown that interaction occur between the compound (O/S-atom at site-2) and Asn Y182 amino acid (C-atom of carbonyl group of-CONH-), as the interaction have higher value of  ∆E ‡ nm than interaction between Tyr-Y183 and Glu-Y185, 186, Table 9.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that the stability of the compound formed between nucleophile and electrophile depends upon the value of difference between softness values of E ‡ m of nucleophile and softness values of E ‡ n of electrophile, ∆E ‡ nm represent the difference. The higher is the ∆E ‡ nm (∆E ‡ nm = | E ‡ n-E ‡ m |) greater is the stability of the compound [22][23][24] . ∆E ‡ nm values, when the compounds treated as nucleophile and receptor amino acids (Asn-Y182, Tyr-Y183 and Glu-Y186) as electrophile, have shown that interaction occur between the compound (O/S-atom at site-2) and Asn Y182 amino acid (C-atom of carbonyl group of-CONH-), as the interaction have higher value of  ∆E ‡ nm than interaction between Tyr-Y183 and Glu-Y185, 186, Table 9.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These softness values are widely used to describe the QSAR study of different series of compounds (Singh et al, 2003(Singh et al, , 2004aPasha et al, 2005a, b). These softness values for a series of testosterone derivatives are available in a recently published work (Srivastava et al, 2005).…”
Section: Theory Of Dft-based Qsarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All descriptor values-except Klopman atomic softness E n à , which was reported by Srivastava et al (2005)-have been calculated using our own developed computer program (QDC) based on the equations given above. E n à values for the derivatives presented in Table 3 were calculated by using the modified Klopman equation (Singh et al, 1980(Singh et al, , 2003. Descriptor values were correlated with observed activities using multiple linear regression analysis to make a reliable and versatile QSAR model.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method for calculation of electron affinity of an atom in a molecule (EA) has been described by us earlier [28] . Since The Local acidic softness En is a measure of electron accepting tendency while the electrophilicity index (ω) of a molecule has been introduced by Parr et al On the basis of these two important values we may derived a new parameter the partial electrophilicity ( ω p ) by multiplying local acidic softness En and elecrtophilicity index (w) as…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%