DFIT Analysis and Simulation: A Utica Shale Field Study

Abstract

Since 2010, hydrocarbon production from long horizontal wells targeting shales has become the norm for industry leaders. Because of the steep decline rates, it is vital to understand the reservoir and its properties before going through with a full-scale fracture stimulation. Through the application of Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests (DFIT), one can determine accurate estimates of closure pressure, net pressure, pore pressure, formation permeability, and induced fracture geometry. The Utica shale is among the most promising reservoirs of the future, but there is limited information available discussing its properties. In SPE-196149-MS, we analyzed a DFIT from one horizontal well targeting the Utica. However, in order to fully understand the Utica shale at scale, further analysis is required. In this study, we will present three additional horizontal wells targeting the Utica, and analyze the pressure and its derivative to accurately estimate the properties mentioned above. DFIT analysis is an advanced technique to accurately predict stress regimes and reservoir properties. However, interpretation of DFIT data is challenging, especially in shale formations. In this study, we overview the geologic properties of the Utica shale, discuss the development of DFIT analysis and its governing equations, then present the three data sets and resulting conclusions. We specifically discuss the Tangent Line Method, the Compliance Method, and the Variable Compliance method in detail, while comparing their underlying equations and assumptions to determine closure pressure. After-Closure analysis is then performed in order to verify fracture closure and identify flow regimes. Through linear regression of this data, pore pressure from a linear flow regime is extrapolated, and through numerical simulation, key reservoir properties, such as permeability and fracture geometry, are estimated for the Utica shale. The DFIT interpretation and simulation results from this study are very insightful. Interpreting the GdP/dG function, the closure pressure ranges from 4,943 psi to 6,141 psi, contributing to a closure pressure gradient of 0.797 to 0.891 psi/ft for the Utica shale. Based on the pressure transient analysis, the pore pressure ranges from 3,238 psi to 4,064 psi, contributing to a pore pressure gradient of 0.486 to 0.616 psi/ft for the Utica shale. Additionally, field wide ranges of reservoirs properties are presented, allowing industry to further optimize their drilling and fracing techniques in the Utica shale. Two of the wells in this study are close in proximity and show very similar results both in After-Closure analysis and in pressure response curves. The third well displays a different GdP/dG response, leak off characteristics, pressure transient behaviors, formation permeability, and fracture geometry. This variance in results can be attributed to regional differences in geology, stresses, and pressures. Therefore, operators need to consider regional differences in reservoir properties in order to enhance the development of Utica shale and unlock all potential recoverable hydrocarbons.