2001
DOI: 10.1002/jps.1158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dextran–methylprednisolone succinate as a prodrug of methylprednisolone: Plasma and tissue disposition**A preliminary account of this study was presented at the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Boston, MA, November 2–6, 1997 (Mehvar R. 1997. Targeted delivery of methylprednisolone using a dextran prodrug. Pharm Res 14:S336).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the concentrations of regenerated MP in the liver at 8 hr following the administration of DMP were 573 and 707 ng/g in two rats. In contrast, no MP is measurable in the liver 8 hr after the administration of the parent drug, consistent with the rapid decline of the liver concentration of the drug after the parent drug administration [7]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, the concentrations of regenerated MP in the liver at 8 hr following the administration of DMP were 573 and 707 ng/g in two rats. In contrast, no MP is measurable in the liver 8 hr after the administration of the parent drug, consistent with the rapid decline of the liver concentration of the drug after the parent drug administration [7]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Because of the relatively high in vivo concentrations of dextran prodrugs of MP in plasma and/or liver, compared with the regenerated MP [7], even a small degradation of the conjugate in vitro can significantly overestimate the MP concentrations regenerated from the conjugate in vivo. A previous work on the in vitro stability of dextran-peptide-MP prodrugs showed that the conjugates are more stable when acetic acid was added to the samples [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences among MPS, DMP1, and/or DMP5 in terms of their AUECs or liver AUCs, C 1 , C 2 , k 1 , and k 2 were analyzed using a two-sided Z-test after Bonferroni adjustment for the appropriate number of comparisons, as described in detail before. 23 All comparisons were performed at a significance level (α) of 0.05 after Bonferroni adjustment, if applicable. The data are presented as mean ± SD for parameters that could be estimated for individual animals (e.g., TNF-α AUC, bile flow rate, maximum effect, and maximum liver concentration) and as mean ± SE for population parameters (e.g., AUEC and liver AUC and bi-exponential parameters of prodrugs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a conjugate linking MP to a 70 kDa dextran using a succinate linker was synthesized, and its pharmacokinetics 23 and pharmacodynamics 2426 were characterized in rats. After the systemic administration, the conjugate selectively accumulated in the rat liver 23 and was much more effective than the parent drug in suppression of immune events in the liver. 24,26 However, the release of MP from the conjugate was slow and incomplete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%