2018
DOI: 10.1093/database/bay045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DEXTER: Disease-Expression Relation Extraction from Text

Abstract: Gene expression levels affect biological processes and play a key role in many diseases. Characterizing expression profiles is useful for clinical research, and diagnostics and prognostics of diseases. There are currently several high-quality databases that capture gene expression information, obtained mostly from large-scale studies, such as microarray and next-generation sequencing technologies, in the context of disease. The scientific literature is another rich source of information on gene expression–dise… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among 2,280 significantly differentially expressed miRNA-cancer correlations, 208 (9.12%) correlations were recorded in the union of the four databases (HMDD, Mir2disease, miRCancer, and miRiaD) to be exclusively over- or under-expressed in certain types of cancer. Furthermore, we randomly selected 24 of the 90 SDEmiRNAs (with a total of 226 miRNA-cancer interactions) as the input for a text mining tool (DEXTER) [41]. After mapping and manual curation, we extracted 157 (69.47%) interactions (Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among 2,280 significantly differentially expressed miRNA-cancer correlations, 208 (9.12%) correlations were recorded in the union of the four databases (HMDD, Mir2disease, miRCancer, and miRiaD) to be exclusively over- or under-expressed in certain types of cancer. Furthermore, we randomly selected 24 of the 90 SDEmiRNAs (with a total of 226 miRNA-cancer interactions) as the input for a text mining tool (DEXTER) [41]. After mapping and manual curation, we extracted 157 (69.47%) interactions (Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also applied our text mining tool, DEXTER, to extract miRNA-cancer correlations from publications [41]. The basic search term is “ [miRNA name] is [over-expressed / under-expressed / significantly higher / lower] in [cancer tissue/sample] compared to [normal / non-tumorous sample]”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the selected differentially expressed miRNAs, we used four experimentally validated databases generated from literature mining: HMDD (v2.0) [57], Mir2disease (2008) [58], miRCancer (March2016) [59], and miRiaD (2016) [60]. We also applied our literature mining tool, DEXTER, to extract miRNA-cancer correlations from publications [61]. The basic search term is "[miRNA name] is [over-expressed / under-expressed / significantly higher / lower] in [cancer tissue/sample] compared to [normal / non-tumorous sample]".…”
Section: Databases For Validation Of Mirnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, diagnostic systems (Chen et al, 2018) have become more relevant and researchers such as Xia et al (2018) attempt to take on the challenge through the mining of information from sources such as DO, Symptom Ontology (SYMP) and MEDLINE/PubMed citation records. We can also observe in the literature a large volume of studies that use the mining of texts from different unstructured or semi-structured medical information sources (Frunza, Inkpen & Tran, 2011;Mazumder et al, 2016;Singhal, Simmons & Lu, 2016;Xu et al, 2016;Tsumoto et al, 2017;Sudeshna, Bhanumathi & Hamlin, 2017;Aich et al, 2017;Gupta et al, 2018;Rao & Rao, 2018;Zhao et al, 2018); (Bou Rjeily et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%