2022
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dexmedetomidine Use in Intensive Care Unit Sedation and Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients Post-Cardiac Surgery (DIRECT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LOWDEXDEL used a similar infusion strategy, beginning at chest closure and run at 0.4 ug/kg/h, in n = 349 patients and also demonstrated no benefit in delirium incidence compared to propofol [22]. The DIRECT trial, which randomized n = 70 adults aged 75 and older, found no benefit for open-label dexmedetomidine in their primary outcome of quality of recovery at postoperative day 3; delirium incidence, which was a secondary outcome, was found to be qualitatively lower in the dexmedetomidine group (24% vs. 42%), but with a nonsignificant p-value due to lack of study power [2 ▪ ]. These small additional trials, among others, have been criticized for lack of blinding, low study power, and poor generalizability, but in total fail to provide strong support for the use of dexmedetomidine in a cardiac surgical population to prevent delirium.…”
Section: What Do the Data Say? It Depends On How You Look At Itmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LOWDEXDEL used a similar infusion strategy, beginning at chest closure and run at 0.4 ug/kg/h, in n = 349 patients and also demonstrated no benefit in delirium incidence compared to propofol [22]. The DIRECT trial, which randomized n = 70 adults aged 75 and older, found no benefit for open-label dexmedetomidine in their primary outcome of quality of recovery at postoperative day 3; delirium incidence, which was a secondary outcome, was found to be qualitatively lower in the dexmedetomidine group (24% vs. 42%), but with a nonsignificant p-value due to lack of study power [2 ▪ ]. These small additional trials, among others, have been criticized for lack of blinding, low study power, and poor generalizability, but in total fail to provide strong support for the use of dexmedetomidine in a cardiac surgical population to prevent delirium.…”
Section: What Do the Data Say? It Depends On How You Look At Itmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Delirium lies at the intersection of traditional and patient-centered outcomes, as it directly leads to personal and family distress, and it is reproducibly associated with delayed neurocognitive recovery, loss of independence and increased likelihood of nonhome discharge, increased hospital length of stay, cost, morbidity and mortality [1,2 ▪ ]. According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, delirium is defined as a disturbance in attention, representing a change from baseline, which develops over a short period of time, fluctuates over the course of the day, is accompanied by an additional cognitive deficit, is not better explained by a preexisting neurocognitive condition and is a direct consequence of a physiologic insult [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Last, a small RCT demonstrated no difference in delirium with the use of DEX versus propofol in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. 13 The lack of benefit in these studies may stem from a reduction in delirium risk as a result of reduced benzodiazepines rather than a dose-dependent protective effect of DEX. 10 Dexmedetomidine has also been evaluated in nonmechanically ventilated adults for delirium prevention.…”
Section: Deliriummentioning
confidence: 99%