2015
DOI: 10.5665/sleep.4328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dexmedetomidine-Induced Sedation Does Not Mimic the Neurobehavioral Phenotypes of Sleep in Sprague Dawley Rat

Abstract: Dexmedetomidine significantly altered normal sleep phenotypes, and the dexmedetomidine-induced state did not compensate for sleep need. Thus, in the Sprague Dawley rat, dexmedetomidine-induced sedation is characterized by behavioral, electrographic, and immunohistochemical phenotypes that are distinctly different from similar measures obtained during sleep.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
4
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because maintaining a patient in a non-REM II state may not confer benefits that are specific to non-REM III and REM sleep stages. A recent laboratory investigation has confirmed previous observations in humans that dexmedetomidine eliminated REM sleep in rats, and that it may not fully compensate for sleep need [ 58 ]. We suggest a principled approach where the administration of dexmedetomidine in critically ill patients may involve different daytime and nighttime sedation drug regimens, and drug delivery systems with electroencephalogram feedback control to more precisely target brain-state goals of care.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This is because maintaining a patient in a non-REM II state may not confer benefits that are specific to non-REM III and REM sleep stages. A recent laboratory investigation has confirmed previous observations in humans that dexmedetomidine eliminated REM sleep in rats, and that it may not fully compensate for sleep need [ 58 ]. We suggest a principled approach where the administration of dexmedetomidine in critically ill patients may involve different daytime and nighttime sedation drug regimens, and drug delivery systems with electroencephalogram feedback control to more precisely target brain-state goals of care.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Similarly, systemic DEX induces excitation in the preoptic hypothalamic area, as seen by cFOS expression (Nelson et al, 2003 ; Zhang et al, 2015 ). One study, on the other hand, did not find cFOS was induced in the POA following DEX-induced sedation (Garrity et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: The Hypothalamic Preoptic Area and α2 Adrenergic Agonist Indmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, the sedative and hypnotic effects of orally delivered dexmedetomidine remain unclear and the impacts of dexmedetomidine on sleep structure are not yet fully understood. Moreover, dexmedetomidine can still induce hypnotic effect in mice unable to synthesize NA (Gilsbach et al, 2009; Hu et al, 2012; Sanders and Maze, 2012; Garrity et al, 2015) or with selective knockdown of alpha-2A adrenergic receptors in the LC (Zhang et al, 2015), suggesting that dexmedetomidine-induced hypnosis may depend on other brain areas in addition to the LC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%