2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/8850116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dexmedetomidine Induced Polyuria in the Intensive Care Unit

Abstract: Dexmedetomidine is an α2-adrenergic used as an adjunct therapy for sedation in the intensive care unit. While it is known to cause polyuria exclusively in perioperative conditions, not many cases are known in the intensive care unit, thus making the diagnosis challenging. We present the case of a 61-year-old male who had developed polyuria secondary to central diabetes insipidus after receiving dexmedetomidine intravenous infusion in the medical ICU. Increased awareness of this uncommon side effect of dexmedet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our patient, we started 0.2 to 0.5 μg/kg per hour without loading dose and without midazolam infusion with no urine output change and then increased it to 1 μg/kg per hour along with polyuria with midazolam initiation. Charran and Lee [4] and Uddin et al [19] reported polyuria at a relatively low dose, whereas Pratt et al [20] reported polyuria at a high dose, similar to that in our patient. When we considered the 2 cases, we noted a similarity in both cases, in which midazolam was administered simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In our patient, we started 0.2 to 0.5 μg/kg per hour without loading dose and without midazolam infusion with no urine output change and then increased it to 1 μg/kg per hour along with polyuria with midazolam initiation. Charran and Lee [4] and Uddin et al [19] reported polyuria at a relatively low dose, whereas Pratt et al [20] reported polyuria at a high dose, similar to that in our patient. When we considered the 2 cases, we noted a similarity in both cases, in which midazolam was administered simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%