2020
DOI: 10.3390/metabo10020042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dexamethasone-Induced Perturbations in Tissue Metabolomics Revealed by Chemical Isotope Labeling LC-MS Analysis

Abstract: Dexamethasone (Dex) is a synthetic glucocorticoid (GC) drug commonly used clinically for the treatment of several inflammatory and immune-mediated diseases. Despite its broad range of indications, the long-term use of Dex is known to be associated with specific abnormalities in several tissues and organs. In this study, the metabolomic effects on five different organs induced by the chronic administration of Dex in the Sprague–Dawley rat model were investigated using the chemical isotope labeling liquid chroma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biomarker and the ratio between the top 20 candidates were selected using the area-under-the-curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, with a sample classification based on PLSDA with a latent number 2 [ 34 , 35 ]. The sample-set was first divided into a test set containing 70% of injections, and a validation set with the remaining 30%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biomarker and the ratio between the top 20 candidates were selected using the area-under-the-curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, with a sample classification based on PLSDA with a latent number 2 [ 34 , 35 ]. The sample-set was first divided into a test set containing 70% of injections, and a validation set with the remaining 30%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to minimize variations in the total sample amount of individual samples using the step-gradient LC-UV method ( Wu and Li, 2012 ), sample normalization was performed, as described in our recent publication ( Dahabiyeh et al, 2020 ). Each sample was labeled by 12 C-dansyl chloride and mixed in equal mole amount with a 13 C-dansyl chloride pool sample based on the LC-UV analysis quantification results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each sample was labeled by 12 C-dansyl chloride and mixed in equal mole amount with a 13 C-dansyl chloride pool sample based on the LC-UV analysis quantification results. The mixtures (2.5 μL containing 0.86 mmol of labeled metabolites) were analyzed by a Thermo Scientific Dionex Ultimate 3000 UHPLC System (Sunnyvale, CA) linked to a Bruker Maxis II quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA) using the same chromatography system and MS parameters described in our previous publication ( Dahabiyeh et al, 2020 ). The Quality control (QC) sample was prepared by mixing the 12 C- and 13 C-labeled pooled samples in equal mole amount.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak area ratios were used for quantitative metabolomics analysis; the same 13 C-labeled pool was spiked into all 12 C-labeled individual samples, and thus the peak ratio values of a labeled metabolite in different samples reflected the concentration differences of this metabolite in these samples. In other words, every 12 C-labeled metabolite from an individual sample had its corresponding 13 C-labeled metabolite in the pooled sample as a reference, resulting in high accuracy for relative quantification ( Jacob et al, 2019a ; Dahabiyeh et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal is to identify potential metabolic biomarkers for IR and T2DM, other than HOMA-IR and HG. CIL is used to modify the chemical and physical properties of metabolites for much-improved separation and enhanced detection sensitivity, thereby increasing the number of detectable metabolites ( Jacob et al, 2019a ; Dahabiyeh et al, 2020 ). Using differential isotope labeling also provides more accurate and precise quantification of metabolite concentration differences in comparative samples (i.e., relative quantification) ( Jacob et al, 2019a ; Dahabiyeh et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%