2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dew observed on cars as a proxy for quantitative measurements

Abstract: We describe a simple method to obtain absolute dew determination in any environment, based on observing dew formed at sunrise on cars. Cars are used as dew condensers where dew yield varies on three different parts that nearly all car exhibits: roof top, windshield and window side. The presence or absence of dew at the sunrise at these particular positions provides an observation scale index n with 4 levels, which is used to quantify dew yield. We show that the index n is proportional to the condensed dew volu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to horizontal substrate and the 30°s ide (which yielded similar values to that of the horizontal substrate), substrates at 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90°exhibited decreasing amounts, being only 75%, 39%, 31%, and 22% that of the horizontal (and 30°) substrate, respectively (Figure 6a; Kidron, 2005). Similar results were recently reported by Beysens, Pruvost, and Pruvost (2016) using the different sections of cars as proxy for the assessment of the angle effect on NRW. All these results were explained by SVF.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In comparison to horizontal substrate and the 30°s ide (which yielded similar values to that of the horizontal substrate), substrates at 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90°exhibited decreasing amounts, being only 75%, 39%, 31%, and 22% that of the horizontal (and 30°) substrate, respectively (Figure 6a; Kidron, 2005). Similar results were recently reported by Beysens, Pruvost, and Pruvost (2016) using the different sections of cars as proxy for the assessment of the angle effect on NRW. All these results were explained by SVF.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Dew yield was positively correlated to relative humidity (RH) with its threshold greater than 70% (Figure 9b) and negatively correlated to the difference between air temperature and dewpoint temperature (T ad ) with its threshold less than 6 • C (Figure 9h). This is similar to the results of Clus et al [57], Maestre-Valero et al [58] and Beysens [2,34]. In particular, dew yield increases significantly when RH is greater than 80% and T ad is less than 3 • C. This indicates that dew forms before the relative humidity reaches saturation and before the air temperature drops to the dewpoint.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The difficulty of dew measurement is both in the definition of dew and in its actual measurement. However, scholars have developed various dew measurement instruments or methods in the past 70 years, including dew gauge [23], electrical resistance sensor [24], hiltner-type dew balance method [25], soil moisture sensor [1], leaf wetness sensor [26][27][28][29][30], artificial condensation surface method [31][32][33][34], and weighing method [6,12,35,36]. The last three items of the methods mentioned above are widely used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most fog events during these observation periods (four field campaigns) occurred in the morning between 4 a.m. and 8 a.m., and only one fog event occurred at night (9 p.m.–11 p.m. in June 2017). Dew was collected using clean paper towels from a car, similar to the method described in Beysens, Pruvost, and Pruvost (). Based on previous field experiences, a dew event with around 15 ml of water collected was considered as a regular dew event, and larger than 30 ml of water collected was considered as a heavy dew event in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%