2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Devices for visually impaired people: High technological devices with low user acceptance and no adaptability for children

Abstract: Considering that cortical plasticity is maximal in the child, why are the majority of technological devices available for visually impaired users meant for adults and not for children? Moreover, despite high technological advancements in recent years, why is there still no full user acceptance of existing sensory substitution devices? The goal of this review is to create a link between neuroscientists and engineers by opening a discussion about the direction that the development of technological devices for vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
81
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
81
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The participants showed significant improvements that were comparable to those of the sighted participants. In agreement with above results, two review studies presented both impaired and enhanced spatial skills of blind individuals across experimental tasks (Cuturi et al 2016; Gori et al 2016). A recent review study that Schinazi et al (2016) conducted suggested that the differences observed could largely be due to the variations in the abilities, strategies taken, and mental representations of the blind individuals.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The participants showed significant improvements that were comparable to those of the sighted participants. In agreement with above results, two review studies presented both impaired and enhanced spatial skills of blind individuals across experimental tasks (Cuturi et al 2016; Gori et al 2016). A recent review study that Schinazi et al (2016) conducted suggested that the differences observed could largely be due to the variations in the abilities, strategies taken, and mental representations of the blind individuals.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Indeed while for sighted individuals the visual feedback represents the most important incentive for actions and thus for the development of mobility and social skills (Gori et al, 2016), visually impaired individuals strongly rely on auditory landmarks to encode spatial and social information. To our knowledge, to date there have been no previous studies on spatial hearing in young visually impaired children that directly assessed the role of residual vision on the development of auditory localization in static and dynamic conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estas relaciones pueden ser explicadas porque durante el desarrollo de la adolescencia las estructuras corticales encargadas de funciones ejecutivas continúan en desarrollo (Giedd, 2008;Kuhn, 2006). Todo ello predispone a reacciones emocionales e impulsivas a los adolescentes (Eshel, Nelson, Blair, Pine, & Ernst, 2007;Maciejewski, van Lier, Branje, Meeus, & Koot, 2015), en vista que en el proceso de regulación emocional las estructuras corticales prefrontales tiene un rol regulador sobre las estructuras subcorticales (Carver, Johnson, & Joormann, 2008;Guyer, Silk, & Nelson, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified