Deviation of the results obtained from different commercial finite element solvers due to friction formulation

Hatzenbichler, Thomas; Harrer, Otto-Karl; Wallner, Stefan; Planitzer, Florian; Kuss, Mario; Pschera, Roman; Buchmayr, Bruno

doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2011.12.020

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For a virtually-correct simulation, the numerical value of the virtual friction coefficient (or parameters) should yield a simulation result comparable to the conducted experiment. This issue is clearly shown in the studies of Tan [5], and Hatzenbichler et al [6]. The second methodology is an inverse approach, in which the simulation is replaced by an analytical computation, such as an upper-bound analysis, as demonstrated in [7] and [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determination of Coulomb’s Friction Coefficient Directly from Cylinder Compression Tests

Duran

Karadoğan

2016

Stroj. vest. - Jour. Mech. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determination of Coulomb’s Friction Coefficient Directly from Cylinder Compression Tests

Duran

Karadoğan

2016

Stroj. vest. - Jour. Mech. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The purpose of this paper is thus focused to investigate how three mostly used commercial FEM codes; Deform [2], Simufact [3] and Forge [4], assign and deal with the heat transfer parameter at the tool/material interface. These codes were developed in the past decade and have successfully been applied to 2D and 3D FEM simulation on various forming processes [5], . They are dedicated to simulation the hot, warm and cold bulk forming.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation and Comparison of Heat Transfers Analysis Used in Commercial FEM for Metal Forming

Flitta¹,

Hatzenbichler

Buchmayr³

2013

MSF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During an Aluminium extrusion process, the extrusion parameters, i.e. friction, heat transfer, etc. are significantly influence by the temperature gradients produced in the billet during transfer to the container and after upsetting the container. The heat transfer at the tool/billet interface governs the temperature profile throughout the billet and tools during extrusion and consequently has a critical influence on the results. Although FEM technique offers great potential, care must be taken when applying the analysis to the hot extrusion of rate sensitive alloys. The most useful approach of an FEM simulation would thus be to include both the tooling and the billet in the calculation as discretised meshes. Because of the occurrence of the conductive and convective heat transfer, the deformation during hot extrusion is not adiabatic and estimation of the temperature increase is alloy dependent. The aim of this paper is to investigate and to compare how commercial FEM codes assign and deal with the heat transfer parameter at the tool/material interface. Three commercial FEM codes were investigated and compared; Simufact, Deform and Forge. The usefulness and limitation when using commercial FEM codes are discussed. Methods to assess difficulty of comparison are presented. The work illustrates the essentials of numerical analysis in the comprehension of the thermo-mechanical events occurring during large deformation. Results are presented for velocity distribution and temperature evolution in both materials and tools. It is shown that the heat transfer parameter to be extremely sensitive when attempting to simulate the hot deformation. Moreover, the accuracy of the results does not only depended on the geometric definition of the tooling and material data but also the governing boundary conditions between the material and tooling.

show abstract

Relationship between friction parameters in a Coulomb–Tresca friction model for bulk metal forming

Zhang

2016

Tribology International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Deviation of the results obtained from different commercial finite element solvers due to friction formulation

Cited by 5 publications

References 7 publications

Determination of Coulomb’s Friction Coefficient Directly from Cylinder Compression Tests

Determination of Coulomb’s Friction Coefficient Directly from Cylinder Compression Tests

Investigation and Comparison of Heat Transfers Analysis Used in Commercial FEM for Metal Forming<sup><sup><sup></sup></sup></sup>

Relationship between friction parameters in a Coulomb–Tresca friction model for bulk metal forming

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About