2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2020.04.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deviation based clustering for unsupervised person re-identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also test our method in unsupervised scenario, i.e., training the ReID model only with GLO. Our method achieves Rank-1 accuracy of 77.4% on Market-1501, significantly outperforming recent BUC [25] and DBC [6] by 11.2% and 8.2%, respectively. It is worth noting that, our unsupervised training also outperforms several domain adaptive methods that use extra source domain for training, such as PAUL [45] and DA_2S [14].…”
Section: Figure 1: Illustration Of Proposed Coupling Optimization Metmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also test our method in unsupervised scenario, i.e., training the ReID model only with GLO. Our method achieves Rank-1 accuracy of 77.4% on Market-1501, significantly outperforming recent BUC [25] and DBC [6] by 11.2% and 8.2%, respectively. It is worth noting that, our unsupervised training also outperforms several domain adaptive methods that use extra source domain for training, such as PAUL [45] and DA_2S [14].…”
Section: Figure 1: Illustration Of Proposed Coupling Optimization Metmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Comparisons are performed on Market-1501 and DukeMTMC-reID. Compared methods include LOMO [24], BOW [54], DBC [6], and BUC [25]. It can be observed from Table 3 that proposed GLO achieves the best performance on both datasets and outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a clear margin.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As the popular technology in unlabeled pedestrian image re-id, many researches [3], [17], [18], [20], [30], [40], [46], [48] [30] formulated an unsupervised multi-label classification for per-…”
Section: ) Comparison With Unsupervised Clustering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper conducts comparison between unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) [5], [7], [8], [16], [23] and clustering methods [3], [17], [18], [20], [30], [40], [46], [48]. The re-id results of these methods are reported in it proposed a multi-task dictionary learning method to learn a dataset-shared but target-data-biased person representation, which outperforms the former state-of-the-arts; Li et al [16] exploited useful knowledge of pre-existing labeled data from…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent methods which follow this approach are [6,7,33,35,36]. Completely unsupervised methods, including [5,18] do not include supervision at any stage of training. Some of these works propose generating pseudo-labels [7,18,35] or pseudo-positive samples [33] that can be utilized as previously within classification or metric losses, respectively.…”
Section: Supervised Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%