2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-13976-6_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developments in Seismic Instrumentation and Health Monitoring of Structures in New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note modern and efficient networks for free-field seismic and structure monitoring in New Zealand, via the collaboration of GNS Science and Earthquake commission EQC [28], create the unique opportunity for this analysis challenging the reliability of current standards-based post-earthquake inspections. They also provide the framework within a larger effort to instrument critical buildings and infrastructure could be undertaken to improve New Zealand's seismic resiliency.…”
Section: Visual Inspection and Shm: Mission Impossible And An Urgent ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to note modern and efficient networks for free-field seismic and structure monitoring in New Zealand, via the collaboration of GNS Science and Earthquake commission EQC [28], create the unique opportunity for this analysis challenging the reliability of current standards-based post-earthquake inspections. They also provide the framework within a larger effort to instrument critical buildings and infrastructure could be undertaken to improve New Zealand's seismic resiliency.…”
Section: Visual Inspection and Shm: Mission Impossible And An Urgent ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only a few have had initiatives to instrument structures for SHM purposes. New Zealand is one of these rare countries, benefiting from an efficient and modernized ground motion monitoring network and a small-scale network of structures instrumented for SHM purposes, which all are defined and developed in the GeoNet project funded by the NZ Earthquake Commission (EQC) [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%