2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10909-012-0713-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developments at the High Field Magnet Laboratory in Nijmegen

Abstract: The High Field Magnet Laboratory at the Radboud University Nijmegen is rapidly expanding its capabilities. The developments encompass both organizational changes and new possibilities for research. The organization of the HFML was strengthened as a consequence of stronger participation of the Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM), and an increase of the core-funding. This change makes that HFML is now considered on a national level as large research facility that operates at an international scal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where constants and c are recovered, and B crit = c(λ 2 C |e|) −1 equals 4.41 × 10 13 G. Such supercritical magnetic fields may be attainable in some astrophysical objects, such as neutron stars and magnetars [31], and also gammaray bursters in scenarios involving protomagnetars [32]; the proper account for the influence of Casimir pressure (106) on physical processes in these objects should be taken. Supercritical magnetic fields are not feasible in terrestrial laboratories where the maximal values of steady magnetic fields are of order of 10 5 G, see, e.g., [33]. In the case of a subcritical magnetic field, |B|≪B crit , we obtain by rewriting (97):…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where constants and c are recovered, and B crit = c(λ 2 C |e|) −1 equals 4.41 × 10 13 G. Such supercritical magnetic fields may be attainable in some astrophysical objects, such as neutron stars and magnetars [31], and also gammaray bursters in scenarios involving protomagnetars [32]; the proper account for the influence of Casimir pressure (106) on physical processes in these objects should be taken. Supercritical magnetic fields are not feasible in terrestrial laboratories where the maximal values of steady magnetic fields are of order of 10 5 G, see, e.g., [33]. In the case of a subcritical magnetic field, |B|≪B crit , we obtain by rewriting (97):…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proper account for the influence of Casimir pressure (45) on physical processes in these objects should be taken. Supercritical magnetic fields are not feasible in terrestrial laboratories where the maximal values of steady magnetic fields are of order of 10 5 G, see, e.g., [18]. In the case of a subcritical magnetic field, |B|≪B crit , one obtains from (33): Otherwise, the same value of the Casimir force is achieved at a = 10 −6 m and B = 10 7 G. Thus, an experimental observation of the influence of the external magnetic field on the Casimir pressure seems to be possible in some future in terrestrial laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This restricts the values of the magnetic field strength to be less than its atomic unit, |B| < 10 9 G, in the case of a scattered particle of the maximally possible wavelength (the bound increases with the decrease of the wavelength). It should be noted that the maximal values of steady magnetic fields which are attainable in laboratory are of order 10 5 G, see, e.g., [14], and this allows us for sure to impose a stronger restriction: r B ≫ k −1 . Defining the total flux of the uniform magnetic field, Φ = πr 2 c B, we rewrite the latter restriction as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%