1977
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1977.tb01182.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Variability in Reaction Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once again this was supported by a main effect for age group, F(1,24)=17.50, p<0.05, with the older group (M=353, SD=145 ms) having significantly faster arm RT compared to the young group (M=479, SD=208 ms); regardless of treatment, test, or direction. These findings support a wealth of literature that as children develop through childhood their reaction times improve (e.g., Eckert and Eichorn 1977). This was further supported by the smaller standard deviations exhibited by the older group across all three treatment groups and all three directions when compared to the younger group.…”
Section: Inferential Findingssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Once again this was supported by a main effect for age group, F(1,24)=17.50, p<0.05, with the older group (M=353, SD=145 ms) having significantly faster arm RT compared to the young group (M=479, SD=208 ms); regardless of treatment, test, or direction. These findings support a wealth of literature that as children develop through childhood their reaction times improve (e.g., Eckert and Eichorn 1977). This was further supported by the smaller standard deviations exhibited by the older group across all three treatment groups and all three directions when compared to the younger group.…”
Section: Inferential Findingssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, post-hoc analyses examining regression coefficients to compare reaction time changes as a function of the number of search items in relation to age shows significant differences in the rate of change between adults and children (t = −5.27, p < .001) as children in this task took on average 107 ms (SD = 18.9) more for each additional search item. This may be a result of differences in selection across age, but is more likely a result of large differences in reaction times as a function of motor development (both hand and eye movements) that would influence the rate of change (e.g., Eckert & Eichorn, 1977), as well as reflect differences in the strategies children use during visual search tasks (Donnelly, Cave, & Geenway, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We predicted that ADHD individuals would perform more poorly than controls in childhood and would continues to do so in adolescence regardless of whether they continued to have ADHD. We further predicted that the performance of ADHD individuals would improve between childhood and adolescence, as these skills are refined as children age (Eckert & Eichorn, 1977;McAuley & White, 2011), but that the extent of improvement would be comparable amongst those with persistent, remittent, and partially remitted forms of the disorder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%