2002
DOI: 10.1542/peds.109.1.144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Surveillance and Screening of Infants and Young Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
24
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Many theorists over the years have discussed the importance of considering culture in child development (Super & Harkness 1986, 2002Harkness & Super 1994;Pachter & Harwood 1996;Greenfield et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many theorists over the years have discussed the importance of considering culture in child development (Super & Harkness 1986, 2002Harkness & Super 1994;Pachter & Harwood 1996;Greenfield et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly, screening tests are regarded as effective when their sensitivities and specificities reach at least 70% to 80%. The M-B CDI-K short form satisfied such conditions as its sensitivity and specificity reach 97.2% and 87.5%, respectively [20,21]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monitoring of children and of the development process combines different assessment methods, which include parents, teachers, pediatricians and other professionals in the assessment. In the process, methods used include anamnesis, observation of the child in her environment, the practice of activities, or the application of screening instruments (23) . Not having a standardized instrument makes it difficult to assess development.…”
Section: Identification Of Delay In Child Development and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%