Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13148-020-00980-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental programming in human umbilical cord vein endothelial cells following fetal growth restriction

Abstract: Background Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with an increased susceptibility for various noncommunicable diseases in adulthood, including cardiovascular and renal disease. During FGR, reduced uteroplacental blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply to the fetus are hypothesized to detrimentally influence cardiovascular and renal programming. This study examined whether developmental programming profiles, especially related to the cardiovascular and renal system, differ in human umbilical vein endothel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, very few studies have considered sex-specific differences, an effect that impacts the differential cardiovascular risk and in which an epigenetic basis must be considered. Recent research suggests that transcriptomic changes resulting from FGR are accompanied by some sex-specific epigenetic modifications (Terstappen et al, 2020), however, these seminal data deserve further confirmation. This also should be applied to life-course changes in epigenetic profiles, which could account for the diversity of physiological responses that precede the instauration of vascular dysfunction.…”
Section: Placental Vessels As Surrogate To Survey the Fetal Vascular Functionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Conversely, very few studies have considered sex-specific differences, an effect that impacts the differential cardiovascular risk and in which an epigenetic basis must be considered. Recent research suggests that transcriptomic changes resulting from FGR are accompanied by some sex-specific epigenetic modifications (Terstappen et al, 2020), however, these seminal data deserve further confirmation. This also should be applied to life-course changes in epigenetic profiles, which could account for the diversity of physiological responses that precede the instauration of vascular dysfunction.…”
Section: Placental Vessels As Surrogate To Survey the Fetal Vascular Functionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…69,70 Reduced uteroplacental blood flow and oxygen and nutrient delivery could cause aberrant fetal growth where the main physiological mechanisms are fetal hemodynamic redistribution and epigenetic alterations. First discussion of the concept of epigenetic programing of cardio-renal disease in FGR included nurim involved in cardiac remodeling, 71 long intergenic non-coding RNAs involved in cardiovascular disease. 71,72 Yzydorczyk et al 73 indicate early endothelial dysfunction may relate with long-term cardiovascularrelated diseases, decreased NO bioavailability, impaired eNOS functionality, oxidative stress, endothelial progenitor cells dysfunction, epigenetic factors, and vascular senescence.…”
Section: Cardiovascular Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study examined the changes in developmental programming profiles in the human umbilical vein endothelial cells following FGR [32]. Using RNA sequencing and transcriptome analysis, they identified four differentially expressed genes (downregulation of LGALS1, FPR3, and NRM; upregulation of RP5-855F14.1).…”
Section: High-throughput Sequencing Approach To Studying Fetal Reprogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While blood collected at time of birth may provide a comprehensive picture of the sum of antenatal stress and is reasonable for use in neonatal outcome prediction, it does not provide an opportunity for assessing the dynamics of fetal reprogramming, nor does it provide any value for clinical decision making in terms of optimal timing of delivery [21]. The placental or umbilical cord tissues are likely the tissue types that are the most sensitive to deprivation of oxygen and/or nutrients, and therefore provide an opportunity to assess reprogramming at its earliest stage [32,33,37]. However, these tissue types do not necessarily reflect the growth and development of the fetal body, and their assessment may not be feasible until after the fetus is delivered.…”
Section: Tissue Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%