2017
DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Pedagogy in Marriage and Family Therapy Education: Preparing Students to Work Across Epistemologies

Abstract: As new practice domains open up for practitioners of family therapy in the medical, organizational, and human relations fields, family therapy educators and supervisors are required to cross the epistemological spaces of scientist‐practitioner, postmodernism, and critical theory. These new possibilities challenge family therapy educators to become comfortable moving between multiple epistemologies and require a hybridization of knowledge and pedagogical approaches. This article identifies multiple conceptual f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C/MFT education programs typically begin by guiding students in the cognitive development of theoretical approaches which may include critical, postmodern, and modernist perspectives that do not readily integrate and initially can be experienced as disruptive or unsettling (Hoff & Distelberg, 2017;Hoff et al, 2018). Even when classroom focus includes a social justice orientation, this emphasis is not often reflected in later practice (Almeida et al, 2008).…”
Section: Therapist Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C/MFT education programs typically begin by guiding students in the cognitive development of theoretical approaches which may include critical, postmodern, and modernist perspectives that do not readily integrate and initially can be experienced as disruptive or unsettling (Hoff & Distelberg, 2017;Hoff et al, 2018). Even when classroom focus includes a social justice orientation, this emphasis is not often reflected in later practice (Almeida et al, 2008).…”
Section: Therapist Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interdisciplinary study of families, typically associated with Departments of HDFS (among many other names, including family studies, family science, and family and consumer science; see Hans, ) is aligned not only with the pedagogical practice of family life education (e.g., Bailey & Gentry, ; Darling et al, ; Hennon, Radina, & Wilson, ; Myers‐Walls et al, ) but also with interdisciplinary sources of knowledge and application from which teachers and students may gain new ideas and strategies to convey the critical, complex, and always compelling subject matter about families (e.g., Allen, ; Few‐Demo, Humble, Curran, & Lloyd, ; Gentry, ; Goldberg & Allen, ; Grzywacz & Allen, ; Hamon & Smith, ; Hoff & Distelberg, ; Sprey, ). What guides our field, whether called HDFS, family science, or a related term (Hans, ), is “a clear and cogent commitment to making a positive difference in human lives” (Grzywacz & Middlemiss, , p. 547).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary and Institutional Challenges In Teaching Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some approaches intentionally consider the relationship between societal discourses and family narratives, couple power dynamics and societal power dynamics, and/or the effect of societal systems of power and privilege on families (e.g., the Cultural Context Model, Almeida, Dolan-Del Vecchio, & Parker, 2008; Narrative Family Therapy, White & Epstein, 1990;Socio-Emotional Relational Therapy, Knudson-Martin & Huenergardt, 2010; and Just Therapy, Waldegrave & Tamasese, 1994). Many family therapists, however, find themselves drawing on disparate epistemological frameworks to do so, even within the same day (Hoff & Distelberg, 2017). It can also be difficult, even when using conceptual frameworks that consider the impact of societal systems on a theoretical level, to apply these understandings to the relational dynamics and material realities of clients' lives (McDowell, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%