2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-012-9529-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental patterns of privatization in higher education: a comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This reflects global patterns of neoliberal reform in higher education (Jamshidi et al. ; Torres and Schugurensky ). However, despite the familiarity of the pattern of a retreating state and rising private sector, for‐profit ISTs do not only signify a private‐sector solution to a crisis in public funding.…”
Section: The Shifting Politics Of Tertiary Schools In Perumentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This reflects global patterns of neoliberal reform in higher education (Jamshidi et al. ; Torres and Schugurensky ). However, despite the familiarity of the pattern of a retreating state and rising private sector, for‐profit ISTs do not only signify a private‐sector solution to a crisis in public funding.…”
Section: The Shifting Politics Of Tertiary Schools In Perumentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Another crucial factor is the level of support institutions receive from the government. Jamshidi et al (2012) contend that the public nature of PHE must be acknowledged at the start of any discussion on the sector. Mabizela (2006) adds that private institutions promote national growth through human resource development and should thus be supported by means of access to funds and land, favourable taxation measures and investment incentives, and staff development opportunities (Tamrat, 2008).…”
Section: Regulatory Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 shows Federal Government Development Expenditure on Education and Training with special reference to the allocation for higher education. Plan (1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990) The promulgation of Private Higher Education Institutions Act (PHEIA) 1996 authorizes private companies, Government Link Companies (GLCs) and non-profit organisations to operate private higher learning institutions (Jamshidi, Arasteh, NavehEbrahim, Zeinabadi, & Rasmussen, 2012;Wilkinson & Yussof, 2005). This initiative has divided the provision of tertiary education into two categories, namely, public universities fully funded by the government and private higher learning institutions funded by private entities.…”
Section: Higher Education Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%