1982
DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(82)90175-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental patterns of human dental morphological traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

9
41
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
9
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Saunders and Mayhall (1982b) also reported a slightly higher frequency of the entoconulid on M1 than dm2 in a Caucasian sample, but again very few individuals displayed the trait. In the present study, we have found a higher frequency of occurrence of the entoconulid on dm2 than M1, although its degree of expression increased distally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Saunders and Mayhall (1982b) also reported a slightly higher frequency of the entoconulid on M1 than dm2 in a Caucasian sample, but again very few individuals displayed the trait. In the present study, we have found a higher frequency of occurrence of the entoconulid on dm2 than M1, although its degree of expression increased distally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Many studies (Alvesalo et al, 1975;Rusmah, 1992;Saunders and Mayhall, 1982;Thomas et al, 1986) failed to show any sex dimorphism in the occurrence of the trait, although some investigators (Kaul and Prakash, 1981;Kieser and Preston, 1981) observed a sex-linked pattern. Therefore, the relationship of sex to the Carabelli trait was not investigated in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Hlusko and Mahaney (2003) found that cusp-like structures which derived from the lingual cingula of maxillary molars in baboons, similar to features referred to as Carabelli trait in humans, were significantly heritable. However, several studies mentioned that Carabelli trait may be present on the deciduous second molar but not on the permanent first molar of the same individual (Townsend and Brown, 1981;Saunders and Mayhall, 1982;Smith et al, 1987;Pinkerton et al, 1999). Interestingly, the reverse relationship is very rare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%