1975
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(75)80062-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental parameters of the ear asymmetry: A multivariate approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
4

Year Published

1979
1979
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is relevant to note here that extremely long stimulus durations (i. e., two sec and longer) have been associated with an increase in REA during development (Satz et al 1975, Ge} Jen 1978, Hiscock and Kinsbourne 1980.…”
Section: Pohl Et Almentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is relevant to note here that extremely long stimulus durations (i. e., two sec and longer) have been associated with an increase in REA during development (Satz et al 1975, Ge} Jen 1978, Hiscock and Kinsbourne 1980.…”
Section: Pohl Et Almentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Because the left hemisphere is dominant for processing speech, the contralateral connection between the right ear and the left hemisphere is stronger compared to the ipsilateral connection between the left ear and left hemisphere, which necessitates transfer from the right hemisphere via the corpus callosum. This structural model describes what is referred to as bottom-up processing (Foundas et al, 2006;Kimura, 1961Kimura, , 1967Satz, Bakker, Teunissen, Goebel, & Van der Vlugt, 1975;Westerhausen & Hugdahl, 2008).…”
Section: Dichotic Listeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to issues of attentional deficits, any neuropsychological theory of attention that utilizes concepts of cerebral specialization and hemispheric lateralization must also address the controversy of whether lateralization is present at birth (Kinsbourne & Hiscock, 1977), develops over time from bilateral to increasing unilaterality as the brain matures (Lennenberg, 1967), or there is a bilateral but unequal hemispheric representation of language which, over development, changes in the degree of lateralization (Satz, Bakker, Teunissen, Goebel, & Van der Vlugt, 1975). Attentional theories based on right hemisphere dominance, hemispheric specific priming, or lateralized neurotransmitter systems would be difficult to support in a young nonlateralized child.…”
Section: Developmental Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%