2017
DOI: 10.1037/dev0000279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental origins of infant emotion regulation: Mediation by temperamental negativity and moderation by maternal sensitivity.

Abstract: Emotion regulation is essential to cognitive, social, and emotional development and difficulties with emotion regulation portend future socioemotional, academic, and behavioral difficulties. There is growing awareness that many developmental outcomes previously thought to begin their development in the postnatal period have their origins in the prenatal period. Thus, there is a need to integrate evidence of prenatal influences within established postnatal factors, such as infant temperament and maternal sensit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
5
46
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results are consistent with Thomas et al (2017), who found that maternal sensitivity buffered the indirect effect of maternal pregnancy anxiety exposure on infant emotion regulation at 6 months via infant temperament at 3 months, with no evidence of moderation of the direct prenatal effect. Nevertheless, the present findings conflict with another study within the QF2011 cohort that found that maternal structuring behaviours buffered the direct effects of flood-related prenatal maternal subjective stress on toddler language development at 30 months (Austin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current results are consistent with Thomas et al (2017), who found that maternal sensitivity buffered the indirect effect of maternal pregnancy anxiety exposure on infant emotion regulation at 6 months via infant temperament at 3 months, with no evidence of moderation of the direct prenatal effect. Nevertheless, the present findings conflict with another study within the QF2011 cohort that found that maternal structuring behaviours buffered the direct effects of flood-related prenatal maternal subjective stress on toddler language development at 30 months (Austin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These studies find support for a moderating role of infant attachment , maternal sensitivity (Grant, McMahon, Reilly, & Austin, 2010) and maternal stroking of newborn infants H. Sharp et al (2012) on indices of early behavioural functioning. However, some studies also find conflicting evidence, and a lack of moderating effects of maternal sensitivity has also been reported (Kaplan, Evans, & Monk, 2008;Thomas, Letourneau, Campbell, Tomfohr-Madsen, & Giesbrecht, 2017).…”
Section: Maternal Caregiving As a Moderator Of The Effects Of Prenatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, healthy maternal–infant relationships are typically characterized as sensitive and responsive interactions that are attentive to the infants’ needs while remaining non-intrusive and non-controlling, and contribute to the regulation of the infant’s response to stress before the infant is physiologically able to self-regulate [3133]. In other words, infants develop their ability to regulate their stress response through their relationship with their maternal caregivers, especially during the first 3 years of life [34, 35]. Caregivers who do not provide sensitive, responsive, non-controlling care promote development of precocious self-regulation, which may have physiological costs, including suppressed immune development [36, 37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have also documented how maternal sensitivity may moderate the association between child temperament and various behavioral outcomes. For example, infants with higher temperamental negativity at 3 months showed greater maladaptive emotion regulation at 6 months, but only when concurrent maternal sensitivity was low (Thomas, Letourneau, Campbell, Tomfohr‐Madsen, & Giesbrecht, ). Similarly, infants with high distress to limitations at 5 months were more likely to demonstrate aggressive behavior at 2.5 years, but only when mothers drew their infants’ attention to frustrating events at 6 months—a behavior that discouraged self‐regulation in infants (Crockenberg, Leerkes, & Jó, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%