2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Localization and Methylesterification of Pectin Epitopes during Somatic Embryogenesis of Banana (Musa spp. AAA)

Abstract: BackgroundThe plant cell walls play an important role in somatic embryogenesis and plant development. Pectins are major chemical components of primary cell walls while homogalacturonan (HG) is the most abundant pectin polysaccharide. Developmental regulation of HG methyl-esterification degree is important for cell adhesion, division and expansion, and in general for proper organ and plant development.Methodology/Principal FindingsDevelopmental localization of pectic homogalacturonan (HG) epitopes and the (1→4)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pectin polymers have been already identified in the ECMSN of embryogenic cultures of carrot (Iwai et al 1999), chicory (Chapman et al 2000b), coconut (Verdeil et al 2001), and banana . In addition, conspicuous differences in pectic composition of the ECMSN coating embryogenic/organogenic and non-regenerative callus domains were reported (Iwai et al 1999;Konieczny et al 2007;Pilarska et al 2007;Xu et al 2011). The results obtained in our study also indicate a tissue-specific composition of the ECMSN: JIM5-reactive HG was detected in the ECMSN over callus surface but not on the surface of somatic embryos.…”
Section: Structure Of the Ecmsnsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pectin polymers have been already identified in the ECMSN of embryogenic cultures of carrot (Iwai et al 1999), chicory (Chapman et al 2000b), coconut (Verdeil et al 2001), and banana . In addition, conspicuous differences in pectic composition of the ECMSN coating embryogenic/organogenic and non-regenerative callus domains were reported (Iwai et al 1999;Konieczny et al 2007;Pilarska et al 2007;Xu et al 2011). The results obtained in our study also indicate a tissue-specific composition of the ECMSN: JIM5-reactive HG was detected in the ECMSN over callus surface but not on the surface of somatic embryos.…”
Section: Structure Of the Ecmsnsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The results obtained in our study also indicate a tissue-specific composition of the ECMSN: JIM5-reactive HG was detected in the ECMSN over callus surface but not on the surface of somatic embryos. In tissues cultured in vitro, Popielarska-Konieczna et al (2008) and Xu et al (2011) localized the JIM5 epitope to the ECMSN coating non-dividing and relatively large parenchyma cells of callus. Noticeably, the cells of T. nigrescens that carried the JIM5 epitope were loosely attached which suggests a relationship between location of low methylesterified HG and cell separation in cultured callus.…”
Section: Structure Of the Ecmsnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the present studies, in spite of the occurrence of ECMSN the calli were not morphogenetic. The extracellular layer covering callus cells, which is not involved in the regeneration process, has previously been reported during androgenesis in wheat [34], somatic embryogenesis in banana [35] and clover cultures [36]. The role of ECMSN cannot be generalized but it is evident that it is formed on the surface of cultured in vitro tissues regardless of its morphogenetic competence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specificities of the primary antibodies JIM5 and JIM7 (CarboSource) have been extensively described (Liners et al, 1989;Knox et al, 1990;Knox, 1997;Willats et al, 2001aWillats et al, , 2001bWillats et al, , 2001cMacquet et al, 2007a;Pattathil et al, 2010;Xu et al, 2011). JIM13, MAC207, JIM8, and CCRC-M7 (CarboSource) have also been previously described (Bradley et al, 1988;Pennell et al, 1989Pennell et al, , 1991Knox et al, 1991;Puhlmann et al, 1994;Yates and Knox, 1994;Steffan et al, 1995;Yates et al, 1996;Majewska-Sawka and Nothnagel, 2000;Pattathil et al, 2010).…”
Section: Microscopy and Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%