2004
DOI: 10.1191/0960327104ht439oa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental effects of propyphenazone in analgesic and antipyretic combination with caffeine or paracetamol

Abstract: The aim of the study was to determine the influence of an over-the-counter (OTC) mixture of propyphenazone with caffeine or paracetamol on prenatal development. Propyphenazone:caffeine and propyphenazone:paracetamol mixtures were prepared with constant 3:1 and 3:5 ratios, respectively. Three dose levels of each of the mixtures were administered separately in Tween-80 water suspension once a day to pregnant Wistar rats on gestation days 8-14. The low dose was similar to the OTC preparations, 2.1 mg/kg … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(58 reference statements)
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial objective was to evaluate the effects of caffeine on skeletal development, when administered by gavage during gestation (Burdan et al, 2000). The later studies were designed to evaluate the effects of over‐the‐counter preparations of various mixtures of propyphenazone, caffeine, and paracetamol, with the purpose of determining liver toxicity (Burdan et al, 2001) and the prenatal risk of COX inhibitors administered with or without caffeine (Burdan, 2002, 2003, 2004). The studies were conducted in general conformance with evaluations performed for testing pharmaceuticals, but used fewer rats than are usually utilized in studies designed for regulatory use (generally 15 per group, rather than the recommended 16–20 litters), an abbreviated treatment period p.c.ds.…”
Section: Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial objective was to evaluate the effects of caffeine on skeletal development, when administered by gavage during gestation (Burdan et al, 2000). The later studies were designed to evaluate the effects of over‐the‐counter preparations of various mixtures of propyphenazone, caffeine, and paracetamol, with the purpose of determining liver toxicity (Burdan et al, 2001) and the prenatal risk of COX inhibitors administered with or without caffeine (Burdan, 2002, 2003, 2004). The studies were conducted in general conformance with evaluations performed for testing pharmaceuticals, but used fewer rats than are usually utilized in studies designed for regulatory use (generally 15 per group, rather than the recommended 16–20 litters), an abbreviated treatment period p.c.ds.…”
Section: Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Burdan (2004) administered maternal dosages of 2.1:0.7, 21:7, or 210:70 mg/kg prophyphenazone:caffeine on p.c.ds. 8 to 14.…”
Section: Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 A combinação dos três princípios ativos (PRO, PAR e CAF) gera uma atividade terapêutica mais eficiente devido a atuação de cada droga em sítios ativos diferentes no organismo proporcionando maior eficácia analgésica e maior rapidez no início de ação quando compara-se com as drogas administradas separadamente. 11,12 Assim, é possível concluir que o uso de formulações farmacêuticas contendo mais de um princípio ativo apresenta vantagens. Dessa forma, no controle de qualidade deste tipo de medicamento, o uso de metodologias analíticas que permitem determinações simultâneas é altamente desejável.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Their popularity is facilitated by accessibility, as they are available for purchase in pharmacies, as well as in kiosks, grocery stores and petrol stations. The drugs in question are used so often because they have antiplatelet, analgesic, antipyretic, anti-inflammatory and tocolytic effects [13,15,40]. In contrast to the well-researched organ toxicity in adults, the adverse effects of COX inhibitors in pregnancy have not yet been fully explained [4,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%