2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental dynamics following selective logging of an evergreen oak forest in the Eastern Himalaya, Bhutan: Structure, composition, and spatial pattern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The occurrence of a large number of plant species in the study area is presumably because of the prevalence of many micro-habitats in the mountainous terrain. The density of trees and shrubs reported from the study site is similar to that of the broad-leaf forests of Dagana Dzongkhag, Bhutan (662 individuals ha −1 ; Tenzin and Hasenauer, 2016) and the stand basal area similar to that of the logged over plots of Chimithanka within Gidakom Forest Management Unit, Bhutan (29.77 m 2 ha −1 ; Covey et al, 2015). The stand basal area, however, was less than that of a humid mixed conifer forest at Dochula Ridge Top, Bhutan (66.4 m 2 ha −1 ; Wangda and Ohsawa, 2006).…”
Section: Discussion Floristic Attributessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The occurrence of a large number of plant species in the study area is presumably because of the prevalence of many micro-habitats in the mountainous terrain. The density of trees and shrubs reported from the study site is similar to that of the broad-leaf forests of Dagana Dzongkhag, Bhutan (662 individuals ha −1 ; Tenzin and Hasenauer, 2016) and the stand basal area similar to that of the logged over plots of Chimithanka within Gidakom Forest Management Unit, Bhutan (29.77 m 2 ha −1 ; Covey et al, 2015). The stand basal area, however, was less than that of a humid mixed conifer forest at Dochula Ridge Top, Bhutan (66.4 m 2 ha −1 ; Wangda and Ohsawa, 2006).…”
Section: Discussion Floristic Attributessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In forest ecosystems, land use histories are important determinants of both community structure and function, with far-reaching effects on both plants and microbes (Goodale & Aber, 2001;Foster et al, 2003;Fraterrigo et al, 2006). In multi-host stands, disturbance events such as fire, disease and logging can facilitate the asymmetric removal of a given host species (Metz et al, 2012;Hollingsworth et al, 2013;Covey et al, 2015), which may open new niche space for existing hosts as well as put significant pressure on hostspecific fungi to associate with nonprimary host trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, the three important components of a watershed (land, water, and vegetation) are increasingly degraded (Sundriyal & Sharma 1996), leading to a loss in biodiversity (Pereira et al 2010;Rands et al 2010;Haddad et al 2015). The relationship between biodiversity and disturbances (natural and anthropogenic) has been studied extensively (Connell 1978;Khan et al 1987;Sundriyal & Sharma 1996;Cannon et al 1998;Masaki et al 1999;Bengtsson et al 2000;Peltzer et al 2000;McKinney 2002;Lorimer & White 2003;Hitimana et al 2004;Kumar & Ram 2005;Rahman et al 2009;Seidl et al 2011;Wangchuk et al 2014;Covey et al 2015;Haddad et al 2015;Pedro et al 2015;Thom & Seidl 2015). All these studies report a strong impact on biodiversity by influencing forest conditions and forests succession dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact may vary by region due to the species composition and the applied silvicultural concept (Fredericksen & Mostacedo 2000). Any harvesting or silvicultural operations may lead to a decrease (Cannon et al 1998;Wangda et al 2009), an increase (Magnusson et al 1999;Paillet et al 2010;Covey et al 2015), limited (Pelissier et al 1998) or no effect (Hall et al 2003;Moktan et al 2009b;Schweitzer & Dey 2011) on species richness, biodiversity or any other ecosystem service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation