2023
DOI: 10.1017/s0305000923000168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental differences in reported speech and internal state language in preschoolers’ personal narratives

Megan E. WELLIVER,
Alice J. DAVIDSON,
Alexandra MCCRARY

Abstract: The present study explored developmental differences in preschoolers’ use of reported speech and internal state language in personal narratives. Three-, four-, and five-year-olds attending a laboratory preschool shared 204 stories about ‘a time when you were happy/sad’. Stories were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for reported speech (direct, indirect, narrativized) and internal state language (cognitive states, total emotion terms, unique emotion terms). Personal narratives told by five-year-olds inclu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although RS use in TD children has been extensively studied (Berger and Pekarek, 2015; Burdelski, 2015; Johansen, 2011; Mahler, 1997; Serratrice et al . 2015; Shiro, 2012; Welliver et al, 2023), there are fewer studies on DLD children (Crespo and Silva, 2019; Crespo et al , 2021, Kaderavek and Sulzby, 2000). If we could understand better RS uses, we could grasp aspects still unrecognized from DLD language performance and some related cognitive and pragmatic aspects of their communicative behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although RS use in TD children has been extensively studied (Berger and Pekarek, 2015; Burdelski, 2015; Johansen, 2011; Mahler, 1997; Serratrice et al . 2015; Shiro, 2012; Welliver et al, 2023), there are fewer studies on DLD children (Crespo and Silva, 2019; Crespo et al , 2021, Kaderavek and Sulzby, 2000). If we could understand better RS uses, we could grasp aspects still unrecognized from DLD language performance and some related cognitive and pragmatic aspects of their communicative behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%