1994
DOI: 10.1097/00004703-199404000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Delay in Healthy Premature Infants at Age Two Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
4

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results do not, however, support the conclusions of Menyuk et al (1995) that children between 3 and 13 weeks premature are as advanced as, or even ahead of, full-term children in their language development, despite the fact that, like Rocissano & Yatchmink (1983), whose cohort was born at 35 weeks' gestation or younger, we show that a few very preterm children have language that is ahead of their full-term peers. As Censullo (1994) suggests, while preterm children (<31 weeks' gestation) can be within normal limits in terms of range of scores, they are more likely to be overrepresented at the lower end of language outcome scales in comparison to full-term children. This observation reinforces the need to use large cohorts in research on the preterm population, so that the considerable variability within the groups does not lead to false conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results do not, however, support the conclusions of Menyuk et al (1995) that children between 3 and 13 weeks premature are as advanced as, or even ahead of, full-term children in their language development, despite the fact that, like Rocissano & Yatchmink (1983), whose cohort was born at 35 weeks' gestation or younger, we show that a few very preterm children have language that is ahead of their full-term peers. As Censullo (1994) suggests, while preterm children (<31 weeks' gestation) can be within normal limits in terms of range of scores, they are more likely to be overrepresented at the lower end of language outcome scales in comparison to full-term children. This observation reinforces the need to use large cohorts in research on the preterm population, so that the considerable variability within the groups does not lead to false conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 ELBW infants have high rates of adverse cognitive and language outcomes that persist through school age. [3][4][5][6][7] Infants of adolescent mothers also have adverse developmental outcomes on a variety of measures. [8][9][10] There is limited research on the combined risk of extreme prematurity and having an adolescent mother.…”
Section: What This Study Addsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sameroff and Chandler 1975, Escalona 1982, Werner 1993, Bendersky and Lewis 1994. Similarly, recent research on ex-special care babies (term or preterm) indicates that sociodemographic factors have a far greater effect on long-term cognitive outcomes than biological risk factors as the children grow older (Wolke 1993;Censullo 1994;Forfar et al 1994;Levy-Shiff et al 1994;Cohen 1995;Hack et al 1995;Wolke 1997aWolke , 1998b. Our results show that SES was related to all cognitive and language scores.…”
Section: Social Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%