Biomarkers in Marine Organisms 2001
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044482913-9/50007-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental, Cytogenetic and Biochemical Effects of Spiked or Environmentally Polluted Sediments in Sea Urchin Bioassays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each treatment schedule, 100 plutei were scored for the frequencies of: (1) normal (N) larvae, according to their symmetry, shape, and size; (2) retarded (R) larvae with shape and symmetry the same as normal, but with reduced size (\1/2 with respect to N); (3) malformed larvae (P1), affected in skeletal and/or gut differentiation and/or pigmentation; and (4) pre-larval arrest (P2), embryos unable to go to larval differentiation, as abnormal blastula or gastrulae (Pagano et al 2001). The viability of embryos (P2, P1, R, and N) was evaluated at microscope observation.…”
Section: Toxicity Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each treatment schedule, 100 plutei were scored for the frequencies of: (1) normal (N) larvae, according to their symmetry, shape, and size; (2) retarded (R) larvae with shape and symmetry the same as normal, but with reduced size (\1/2 with respect to N); (3) malformed larvae (P1), affected in skeletal and/or gut differentiation and/or pigmentation; and (4) pre-larval arrest (P2), embryos unable to go to larval differentiation, as abnormal blastula or gastrulae (Pagano et al 2001). The viability of embryos (P2, P1, R, and N) was evaluated at microscope observation.…”
Section: Toxicity Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ehir facilities are an exception due to their distance ( '200 km) from the coast; hence, the two holding ponds are used as dumping sites. A second, more general argument relates to the utilization of the sea urchin test system in a variety of subjects and substrates, e.g., in testing pharmaceutical drugs, industrial chemicals, and complex mixtures not con"ned to the marine environment, e.g., river sediment and industrial sludge (Pagano and Trie!, 1992;Pagano et al, 1993Pagano et al, , 2000Graillet et al, 1993;Trie! et al, 1995).…”
Section: Sea Urchin Toxicity Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilization of sea urchin bioassays in toxicity testing unconfined to marine pollution may be justified by the following facts. First, since the earliest reports, sea urchin embryos have been used either to evaluate marine pollution (e.g., seawater or sediment quality) or to test toxicity of a number of xenobiotics and nonmarine complex mixtures (e.g., pharmaceutical drugs or plant effluents), reviewed in [6,7]; in addition, in this series of studies, the red sludge may be viewed either as an aquatic or as a terrestrial pollutant, according to whether it is disposed offshore or in a lake or whether it is released in dry form as a solid residue from the plant [2][3][4][5]. Hence, both the extensive toxicological background studies and their continuity with our previous studies of bauxite sludge prompted us to verify whether and to what extent bauxite solid residues exerted any comparable toxicity to sea urchin embryogenesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%