We respond to a recent report by Abbasi and Marcus who present two main findings: first they argue that there is an organiser and a compartment boundary within the posterior compartment of the butterfly wing. Second, they present evidence for a previously undiscovered lineage boundary near wing vein 5 in
Drosophila
, a boundary that delineates a “far posterior” compartment. Clones of cells were marked with the
yellow
mutation and they reported that these clones always fail to cross a line close to vein 5 on the
Drosophila
wing. In our hands
yellow
proved an unusable marker for clones in the wing blade and therefore we reexamined the matter. We marked clones of cells with
multiple wing hairs
or
forked
and found a substantial proportion of these clones cross the proposed lineage boundary near vein 5, in conflict with their findings and conclusion. As internal controls we showed that these same clones respect the other two well established compartment boundaries: the anteroposterior compartment boundary is always respected. The dorsoventral boundary is mostly respected, and is crossed only by clones that are induced early in development, consistent with many reports. We question the validity of Abbasi and Marcus’ conclusions regarding the butterfly wing but present no new data.
Arising from: R. Abbasi and J. M. Marcus
Sci
.
Rep
.
7
, 16337 (2017); 10.1038/s41598-017-16553-5.