2000
DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Changes in Children's Abilities to Share and Allocate Attention in a Dual Task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
67
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All children met the cognitive inclusion criteria however we hypothesize that the combined task required more attentional resources for children. This interpretation is based on our observations of increased reaction time while seated as well as findings from related literature citing the continued development and maturation of attention division (Irwin-Chase & Burns, 2000).…”
Section: Children Require More Attentional Resources For the Same Tasksupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All children met the cognitive inclusion criteria however we hypothesize that the combined task required more attentional resources for children. This interpretation is based on our observations of increased reaction time while seated as well as findings from related literature citing the continued development and maturation of attention division (Irwin-Chase & Burns, 2000).…”
Section: Children Require More Attentional Resources For the Same Tasksupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Once single task performance was equalized between participants, DTC differences between age groups no longer existed. The decrease in DTC, typically associated with age, was simply due to an increase in performance of each task separately combined with an increased ability to divide attention between tasks (Irwin-Chase & Burns, 2000). Irwin-Chase and Burns (2000) concluded that the development of attention division is not only due to ongoing central maturation but the increase in automaticity of attentional allocation with age that aids coordination of mental resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ADHD group responded to an attention loading task by walking more slowly. Previous work using other dual task paradigms indicates that, in general, the dual task effects of middle school children are for the most part similar to those of adults [52,53]. It is, therefore, not surprising that the dual tasking effect on gait speed is similar to the response observed in other populations.…”
Section: Discussion J Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Instead they posit that the ability to prioritize one task over another or to strategically organize and schedule concurrent responses add to dual-task costs over and above general resource demands. For example, Irwin-Chase and Burns [16] showed that after individual differences in children's capacity for single-task performance were controlled for, age differences between 8-and 11-year old children only existed, when tasks had different priorities. In older adults, Kramer et al demonstrated similar abilities in implementing differential priority schemes as in young adults [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%