2001
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Aspects of Pediatric fMRI: Considerations for Image Acquisition, Analysis, and Interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
117
2
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
4
117
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers have expressed some doubt about using transformation to stereotaxic space in children. 35,36 Others, however, have shown that differences due to age are beneath the resolution provided by the current imaging technology. 37 In addition, functional analysis maps projected onto averaged anatomical images appear not to produce false variance between age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have expressed some doubt about using transformation to stereotaxic space in children. 35,36 Others, however, have shown that differences due to age are beneath the resolution provided by the current imaging technology. 37 In addition, functional analysis maps projected onto averaged anatomical images appear not to produce false variance between age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In functional imaging studies, tasks must adhere to specified limitations posed by physical properties of the imaging method used. [86][87][88][89] For instance, tasks in fMRI need to minimise any form of physical-body movements, because this would negatively affect image quality. At the same time tasks should assess the desired construct without reaching ceiling or floor effects (or producing chance performance) for every age group.…”
Section: Two Sorts Of Constructivist Developmental (Neo-piagetian) Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one run was discarded due to excessive motion. Although some have questioned the use of transformation to stereotaxic space for children's brains in group studies of structure and function (Gaillard et al, 2001), recent findings indicate that differences between age groups are beneath the resolution provided by current imaging technology (Burgund et al, 2002). Furthermore, functional analysis maps projected onto averaged anatomical images appear not to produce false variance between age groups (Burgund et al, 2002).…”
Section: Behavioral Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%