2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep35071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, validation and application of a device to measure e-cigarette users’ puffing topography

Abstract: With the rapidly rising popularity and substantial evolution of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in the past 5–6 years, how these devices are used by vapers and consumers’ exposure to aerosol emissions need to be understood. We used puffing topography to measure directly product use. We adapted a cigarette puffing topography device for use with e-cigarettes. We performed validation using air and e-cigarette aerosol under multiple regimes. Consumer puffing topography was measured for 60 vapers provided with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the natural environment, puff duration and other puff parameters (e.g., number of puffs, inter-puff interval, flow rate, volume) are controlled by the user (Robinson et al, 2015; Robinson et al, 2016), although manipulation of these parameters through controlled vaping bouts has occurred in laboratory settings (Spindle et al, 2016). In humans, average puff duration for e-cigarettes (“cigalikes” and tank-based systems) appeared dependent upon nicotine concentration (Lopez et al, 2016; Ramoa et al, 2016; Spindle et al, 2016) and showed considerable variability, ranging from 1.8 to 6.1 s (Cunningham et al, 2016; Ramoa et al, 2016; Robinson et al, 2015; Spindle et al, 2016). In the present study, duration of aerosol generation was 10 seconds, with subsequent 1-minute hold in the chamber.…”
Section: 0 Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the natural environment, puff duration and other puff parameters (e.g., number of puffs, inter-puff interval, flow rate, volume) are controlled by the user (Robinson et al, 2015; Robinson et al, 2016), although manipulation of these parameters through controlled vaping bouts has occurred in laboratory settings (Spindle et al, 2016). In humans, average puff duration for e-cigarettes (“cigalikes” and tank-based systems) appeared dependent upon nicotine concentration (Lopez et al, 2016; Ramoa et al, 2016; Spindle et al, 2016) and showed considerable variability, ranging from 1.8 to 6.1 s (Cunningham et al, 2016; Ramoa et al, 2016; Robinson et al, 2015; Spindle et al, 2016). In the present study, duration of aerosol generation was 10 seconds, with subsequent 1-minute hold in the chamber.…”
Section: 0 Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 15‐minute break between the 2 exposure sessions was given so that the animals could access fresh air, food, and water. The puff duration was 3 seconds, puff interval 1 minute, and the puff volume was 50 mL, all of which mimics real‐life exposure scenarios 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33. As for the controls or control mice, they were matched in terms of age and sex (ie, 10‐week‐old males), and were exposed to clean air.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure transducers work by detecting a pressure change across the orifice (2 mm in diameter), which is proportional to the flow rate squared 9 . The product holder was modified for use with e-cigarettes as outlined by Cunningham et al 23 (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Study Design Initial Visit To Central Study Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%