2006
DOI: 10.3138/jvme.33.1.38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, Teaching, and Evaluation of a Consultation Structure Model for Use in Veterinary Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…, Radford et al . , Mossop & Gray ), commonly in the form of the Calgary‐Cambridge model (Silverman & Kurtz , Adams & Kurtz , Kurtz ). Although the Calgary‐Cambridge model concentrates on communication in the consultation, the physical examination has now been incorporated into the model to facilitate integration with the tasks of the consultation (Kurtz et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Radford et al . , Mossop & Gray ), commonly in the form of the Calgary‐Cambridge model (Silverman & Kurtz , Adams & Kurtz , Kurtz ). Although the Calgary‐Cambridge model concentrates on communication in the consultation, the physical examination has now been incorporated into the model to facilitate integration with the tasks of the consultation (Kurtz et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst ethical principles strongly underpin any procedure for gaining informed consent, effective and thoughtful communication skills also play a vital role. If we look at the ‘Guide to the Veterinary Consultation based on the Calgary Cambridge Model’ (Radford et al, (), a gold standard framework for teaching and practising consultation communication skills, there are several key areas that should be addressed.…”
Section: Communication Communication Communication…mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The veterinary consult can be described as tripartite, involving the owner, patient and the veterinarian 9. Shaw and colleagues 3 acknowledge that whilst there are similarities there are also contextual differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most obvious, of course, is that the patient is an animal. Radford and colleagues9 included the need to attend to the animal’s comfort, establishing the role and purpose of the animal to the owner and using the animal to build a relationship with the client. Shaw et al3 also list aspects of the human-animal bond, which might be comparable to, but are not the same as the parent-child bond; euthanasia and the challenges that brings for both the client and also the veterinarian; the death of patients, which is far more frequent for veterinarians than most medical practitioners (dependent on specialty); and financial considerations which might result in the withholding of treatment or the euthanasia of an animal, situations that do not occur as a matter of course in human medicine, particularly in countries like Australia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%