Development, reliability, and validity of the case management quality of care scale (CMQS) among clients with first episode psychosis

Wong, Horng Hien; Abdin, Edimansyah; Vaingankar, Janhavi Ajit; Chua, Yi Chian; Yong, Yee Huei; Shahwan, Shazana; Cetty, Laxman; Hon, Charlene; Chan, Wei Quan Jeremy; Lee, Helen; Verma, Swapna; Subramaniam, Mythily

doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102271

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The current data is part of a larger study which aimed to develop and validate a new scale to measure quality of care in a case management service (Wong et al, 2020) and was approved by the National Healthcare Group's Domain Specific Review Board (DSRB Ref. No.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As part of the original study by Wong et al (2020), participants had to independently complete the ReQoL‐10 (Keetharuth et al, 2018), which is not part of the ratings collected for the EPIP database. The ReQoL‐10 is a self‐rated 10‐item instrument, where participants rate their own QoL on a five‐point Likert scale from 0 to 4, with a higher score indicating a higher perceived QoL.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Recovering Quality of Life 10‐item (ReQoL‐10) scale in a first‐episode psychosis population: Validation and implications for patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs)

Chua

Wong

Abdin

et al. 2020

Early Intervention Psych

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim This study aimed to examine the psychometric performance of the Recovering Quality of Life scale 10‐item version (ReQoL‐10) using a sample from a Singapore first‐episode psychosis intervention program, to explore its clinical and sociodemographic correlates, and to discuss its utility as a patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM). Methods Sociodemographic data, duration of untreated psychosis (DUP), and diagnosis were collected from 300 participants. Clinical data, which included baseline and current scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire 9‐item version, EuroQoL‐5 Dimension 3‐level version, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and Global Assessment of Functioning scale, were extracted. The ReQoL‐10 was tested for structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity, and a multiple linear regression determined if any of the baseline factors were statistically significant predictors of the total ReQoL‐10 scores. Results The mean (SD) total ReQoL‐10 score of the sample was 27.8 (7.8). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the bifactor model structure of the ReQoL‐10. The instrument demonstrated good internal consistency and adequate construct validity. Being older was associated with higher total ReQoL‐10 scores, while being married, having a highest educational level of vocational/diploma, longer DUP, and a diagnosis of affective psychosis were associated with lower total ReQoL‐10 scores. Conclusions This study has validated the ReQoL‐10 as suitable for routine use to measure recovery‐specific quality of life in a psychiatric setting among patients with first‐episode psychosis, and is a potential tool to initiate recovery conversations. As a PROM, it can facilitate shared decision making, in line with efforts to evaluate and improve quality of care.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Recovering Quality of Life 10‐item (ReQoL‐10) scale in a first‐episode psychosis population: Validation and implications for patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs)

Chua

Wong

Abdin

et al. 2020

Early Intervention Psych

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Despite early intervention services for psychosis being thus patient‐ and family‐oriented, there has been surprisingly little research on patients' and families' experience of the care process in these services. Exceptions to this are some studies on patients' satisfaction with care and therapeutic alliance (Hasson‐Ohayon et al, 2021; Wong et al, 2020). Furthermore, few patient‐reported experience measures (PREMs) and family‐reported experience measures (FREMs) have been created for early psychosis services (Ferrari et al, 2022; Wong et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Exceptions to this are some studies on patients' satisfaction with care and therapeutic alliance (Hasson‐Ohayon et al, 2021; Wong et al, 2020). Furthermore, few patient‐reported experience measures (PREMs) and family‐reported experience measures (FREMs) have been created for early psychosis services (Ferrari et al, 2022; Wong et al, 2020). Two efforts are however noteworthy, including the youth mental health service satisfaction measure developed in the context of the Australian headspace initiative (Simmons et al, 2014) and the youth services survey included in PhenX, the U.S initiative to harmonize measurement in coordinated speciality care centres for early psychosis (Brunk et al, 2000; Hamilton et al, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Show me you care: A patient‐ and family‐reported measure of care experiences in early psychosis services

Iyer

Taksal

Malla

et al. 2022

Early Intervention Psych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim Despite their emphasis on engagement, there has been little research on patients' and families' experiences of care in early intervention services for psychosis. We sought to compare patients' and families' experiences of care in two similar early psychosis services in Montreal, Canada and Chennai, India. Because no patient‐ or family‐reported experience measures had been used in a low‐ and middle‐income context, we created a new measure, Show me you care. Here we present its development and psychometric properties. Methods Show me you care was created based on the literature and stakeholder inputs. Its patient and family versions contain the same nine items (rated on a 7‐point scale) about various supportive behaviours of treatment providers towards patients and families. Patients (N = 293) and families (N = 237) completed the measure in French/English in Montreal and Tamil/English in Chennai. Test–retest reliability, internal consistency, convergent validity, and ease of use were evaluated. Results Test–retest reliability (intra‐class correlation coefficients) ranged from excellent (0.95) to good (0.66) across the patient and family versions, in Montreal and Chennai, and in English, French, and Tamil. Internal consistency estimates (Cronbach's alphas) were excellent (≥0.87). The measure was reported to be easy to understand and complete. Conclusion Show me you care fills a gap between principles and practice by making engagement and collaboration as central to measurement in early intervention as it is to its philosophy. Having been co‐designed and developed in three languages and tested in a low‐and‐middle‐income and a high‐income context, our tool has the potential for global application.

show abstract

Therapeutic alliance with case managers in first-episode psychosis

Chua

Tang

Abdin

et al. 2022

Asian Journal of Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Development, reliability, and validity of the case management quality of care scale (CMQS) among clients with first episode psychosis

Cited by 5 publications

References 23 publications

The Recovering Quality of Life 10‐item (ReQoL‐10) scale in a first‐episode psychosis population: Validation and implications for patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs)

The Recovering Quality of Life 10‐item (ReQoL‐10) scale in a first‐episode psychosis population: Validation and implications for patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs)

Show me you care: A patient‐ and family‐reported measure of care experiences in early psychosis services

Therapeutic alliance with case managers in first-episode psychosis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About