2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2000.tb10933.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social funtioning

Abstract: Compared to SOFAS, PSP has better face validity and psychometric properties. It was found to be an acceptable, quick and valid measure of patients' personal and social functioning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
473
0
24

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 805 publications
(525 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
473
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…The Personal and Social Functioning Scale [FPS; Morosini et al, 2000] was used to assess patients' level of overall functioning.…”
Section: Psychopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Personal and Social Functioning Scale [FPS; Morosini et al, 2000] was used to assess patients' level of overall functioning.…”
Section: Psychopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychopathology and psychosocial functioning were assessed by the following: the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (Ventura et al, 1993), the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale, a modified version of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) (Morosini et al, 2000) and the Specific Levels Of Functioning (SLOF) (Harvey et al, 2011).…”
Section: Baseline Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social functioning was rated using the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) (Morosini et al 2000). PSP is reliable and well established, based on the most recent version of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SO-FAS).…”
Section: Social Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%