2014
DOI: 10.7567/apex.7.062401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of X-ray-induced afterglow characterization system

Abstract: To evaluate the X-ray-induced afterglow phenomenon, we developed an ionizing-radiation-induced luminescence characterization system equipped with a pulse-width-tunable X-ray source. The system consists of a pulse X-ray tube and a detector system based on photon counting. The excitation pulse width was tunable from nano- to millisecond ranges, and the dynamic range of the X-ray-induced afterglow was 106. Conventional scintillators for X-ray CT or security systems, namely, Bi4Ge3O12, CdWO4, Tl-doped CsI, and Tb … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
205
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 369 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
205
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The scintillation decay time profile was measured by using our original setup equipped with a pulse X-ray source. (20) The decay time was estimated by approximating with a 1st-or 2nd-order exponential decay function. The data presented for the Pr-and Tb-doped C12A7 were previously reported.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scintillation decay time profile was measured by using our original setup equipped with a pulse X-ray source. (20) The decay time was estimated by approximating with a 1st-or 2nd-order exponential decay function. The data presented for the Pr-and Tb-doped C12A7 were previously reported.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7 shows the scintillation decay time profiles of SNGS and LTGA. In our previous study, (2) we could not measure the decay time profile of LTGA but, owing to the development of the new characterization system, (17) we could observe it in this study. The scintillation decay time of LTGA was 8 ns, which is similar to that in PL decay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emission was measured using an Andor DU-420-BU2 CCD spectrometer, and a detailed explanation for the setup was previously reported. (15) X-ray-induced decay time kinetics were evaluated using a pulse X-ray streak system (16) to observe the rise part and an afterglow characterization system with the fast mode (17) for the entire decay time profile. Finally, scintillators were coupled with photomultiplier tube (PMT) R7600-200 (Hamamatsu) with optical grease, and a 137 Cs γ-ray or 241 Am α-ray were irradiated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(26) The scintillation decay time profile was obtained using a customized-setup, pulsed X-rayinduced scintillation characterization system (Hamamatsu). (27) Pulsed X-rays were generated by combining the pulsed LED light source and X-ray tube. The scintillation light was measured with a Hamamatsu R7400P-06 photomultiplier tube (PMT).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%