2018
DOI: 10.21577/0103-5053.20180013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Web and Mobile Applications for Chemical Toxicity Prediction

Abstract: Computational tools are recognized to provide high-quality predictions for the assessment of chemical toxicity. In the recent years, mobile devices have become ubiquitous, allowing for the development of innovative and useful models implemented as chemical software applications. Here, we will briefly discuss this recent uptick in the development of web-based and mobile applications for chemical problems, focusing on best practices, development, usage and interpretation. As an example, we also describe two inno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models are used in drug discovery and development and for assessment of the effects of xenobiotics on humans and environment. Computational tools that were developed for hazard assessment include (quantitative) structure-activity relationships [(Q)SARs], read-across methods, expert rule-based (structural alerts) methods, and molecular modeling techniques (Alves et al, 2018a; Myatt et al, 2018; Yang et al, 2018). The Organization of Economic and Co-operation Development (OECD) created QSAR guidelines already in 2004 and the principles for the construction of (Q)SAR models, computational methods, and model validation methods are described in detail since 2007 (Fjodorova et al, 2008; Lo Piparo and Worth, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are used in drug discovery and development and for assessment of the effects of xenobiotics on humans and environment. Computational tools that were developed for hazard assessment include (quantitative) structure-activity relationships [(Q)SARs], read-across methods, expert rule-based (structural alerts) methods, and molecular modeling techniques (Alves et al, 2018a; Myatt et al, 2018; Yang et al, 2018). The Organization of Economic and Co-operation Development (OECD) created QSAR guidelines already in 2004 and the principles for the construction of (Q)SAR models, computational methods, and model validation methods are described in detail since 2007 (Fjodorova et al, 2008; Lo Piparo and Worth, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculation methods for predicting chemical toxicity are rapidly developed (Alves et al, 2018; Karim, Mishra, et al, 2019; Karim, Singh, et al, 2019; Yang et al, 2018). Toxicity modeling is one type of computer model that can predict the activities or properties of chemicals based on their physicochemical or structural parameters.…”
Section: Computer Simulation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pred-hERG (Braga et al, 2015;Alves et al, 2018) is a web app that allows users to predict blockers and non-blockers of the hERG channels, and important drug anti-target associated with lethal cardiac arrhythmia (Mitcheson et al, 2000). The current version of the app (v. 4.2) was developed using ChEMBL (Willighagen et al, 2013) version 23, containing 8,134 compounds with hERG blockage data after curation, using robust and predictive machine learning models based on RF.…”
Section: Prediction Of Admet Properties Of New Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%