2019
DOI: 10.3390/w12010093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Water Level Prediction Models Using Machine Learning in Wetlands: A Case Study of Upo Wetland in South Korea

Abstract: Wetlands play a vital role in hydrologic and ecologic communities. Since there are few studies conducted for wetland water level prediction due to the unavailability of data, this study developed a water level prediction model using various machine learning models such as artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). The Upo wetland, which is the largest inland wetland in South Korea, was selected as the study area. The daily water level gauge data f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For SVR, penalty and kernel parameters were selected as the hyperparameters [46]. According to Choi et al [54], the two main parameters to be determined in an RFR model are N split and N tree , where N split is the minimum number of samples required to split. For MLPR, a single hidden layer is used because of its relatively wide application.…”
Section: Analysis Of Model Training Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For SVR, penalty and kernel parameters were selected as the hyperparameters [46]. According to Choi et al [54], the two main parameters to be determined in an RFR model are N split and N tree , where N split is the minimum number of samples required to split. For MLPR, a single hidden layer is used because of its relatively wide application.…”
Section: Analysis Of Model Training Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of RFR are its simplicity and the low number of required parameters. The RFR algorithm, as shown in Figure 1b, is summarized as follows [20,26,27,54]:…”
Section: Rfrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support vector machines can apply kernel functions to map original data into a higher dimension and to the input for minimizing the ε-insensitive loos function [48]. The typical kernel functions include Polynomial, Sigmoid, and Radial Basis Function (RBF).…”
Section: Support Vector Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical kernel functions include Polynomial, Sigmoid, and Radial Basis Function (RBF). This study used the RBF to SVM model since it is a very popular kernel function used in SVM model and shows high reliability [48]. The SVM model is applicable not only to classification but also to regression for prediction by applying an ε-insensitive loss function to the SVM.…”
Section: Support Vector Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Choi et al (2020), authors compare some implementations of machine learning algorithms to predict water level temporal series in a Korean wetland, with emphasis in water level peaks. They tested algorithms like neural network, decision tree random forest and support vector machine concluding that the random forest had the better prediction performance.…”
Section: Literature Review Of Hydrological Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%