2006
DOI: 10.1177/0142723706056475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of vocabulary and grammar in young German-speaking children assessed with a German language development inventory

Abstract: A B S T R A C TUsing a parent report instrument, the development of vocabulary and grammar was examined in 333 German-speaking children aged between 1;6 and 2;6. Grammar scales measured sentence complexity and inflectional morphology. Results indicate that vocabulary increased faster than sentence complexity and inflectional morphology. Within inflectional paradigms, noun plural and gender marking were acquired faster than case marking and verb inflections. Modals and copula were acquired most slowly. There wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The results also indicated that recognizing vocabulary items in the PPVT test benefited both language groups’ grammar recognition. This finding is in line with a basic assumption of usage‐based approaches to language, namely, that a strict separation between lexis and grammar is unattainable (Langacker, ), and with the findings of research on L1 acquisition showing the interdependence of lexicon and grammar in early language development (e.g., Bates et al., ; Bates & Goodman, ; Marchman & Bates, ; Szagun et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The results also indicated that recognizing vocabulary items in the PPVT test benefited both language groups’ grammar recognition. This finding is in line with a basic assumption of usage‐based approaches to language, namely, that a strict separation between lexis and grammar is unattainable (Langacker, ), and with the findings of research on L1 acquisition showing the interdependence of lexicon and grammar in early language development (e.g., Bates et al., ; Bates & Goodman, ; Marchman & Bates, ; Szagun et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Contrary to popular perception, the child’s gender usually only explains about 1% to 3% of reported variance in vocabulary size or related variables (Ardila, Rosselli, Matute, & Inozemtseva, 2011 ; Szagun, Steinbrink, Franik, & Stumper, 2006 ; for a review see Hyde, 2014). This makes gender differences likely to be detectable in large samples only (e.g., Berglund et al., 2005 ; Bornstein et al, 2004 ; Leaper & Smith, 2004), but even a recent study that included more than 5,000 one- to six-year olds did not find reliable differences with regard to boys’ and girls’ language skills (Luijk et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The effect of gender on early lexical acquisition (rate) has been widely investigated and demonstrated consistently over a wide range of studies. Studies based on CDI data or comparable vocabulary measures of a rather large sample size have found a slightly but consistently higher acquisition rate in girls than in boys for both comprehension and production (e.g., Bornstein, Hahn & Haynes, 2004a;Fenson et al 1994;Maital, Dromi, Sagi & Bornstein, 2000;Szagun, Steinbrink, Franik & Stumper, 2006). The effect of birth order on lexical acquisition seems less marked and consistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%