2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference 2006
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2006.1707382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of vision-based lane and vehicle detecting systems via the implementation with a dual-core DSP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acquired images are, first, preprocessed in order to reduce the noise always caused by the sensors (Min, Liu, & Xu, 2006;Wennan, Qiang, & Hong, 2006;Ming-Dar, et al, 2008), to reduce the execution time based on the processing of a region of interest (Min, Liu, & Xu, 2006;Lim, Seng, Ngo, & Ang, 2009), or also to reduce the perspective effect of the lane by applying the inverse perspective mapping (Juan, Hilario, de la Escalera, & Armingol, 2005;Zu, 2006). The second step extracts the approximate pixels of LM either by detecting their edges (Min, Liu, & Xu, 2006;Ming-Dar, et al, 2008;Chih-Hsein & Chen, 2006;Haiping, Ko, Shil, Kim, & Kim, 2007), or by detecting their regions throw image segmentation (Lim, Seng, Ngo, & Ang, 2009;Serge, Michel, & Xuan, 1989;Chao, Mei, & D, 2010). The third step, the lane detection step, determines effective limits on an acquired image, based on the approximate pixels retained in the second step.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquired images are, first, preprocessed in order to reduce the noise always caused by the sensors (Min, Liu, & Xu, 2006;Wennan, Qiang, & Hong, 2006;Ming-Dar, et al, 2008), to reduce the execution time based on the processing of a region of interest (Min, Liu, & Xu, 2006;Lim, Seng, Ngo, & Ang, 2009), or also to reduce the perspective effect of the lane by applying the inverse perspective mapping (Juan, Hilario, de la Escalera, & Armingol, 2005;Zu, 2006). The second step extracts the approximate pixels of LM either by detecting their edges (Min, Liu, & Xu, 2006;Ming-Dar, et al, 2008;Chih-Hsein & Chen, 2006;Haiping, Ko, Shil, Kim, & Kim, 2007), or by detecting their regions throw image segmentation (Lim, Seng, Ngo, & Ang, 2009;Serge, Michel, & Xuan, 1989;Chao, Mei, & D, 2010). The third step, the lane detection step, determines effective limits on an acquired image, based on the approximate pixels retained in the second step.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These windows are then filtered according to the coherence of their position and dimensions with respect to lane markings, before evaluating them with a more sophisticated detector. Alternatively, Chih-Hsien and Yung-Hsin (2006) and Sotelo et al (2005) used lane markings to guide the search for vehicles, processing frames in a more efficient and coherent manner.…”
Section: Combining Lane and Vehicle Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%