2019
DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2019.1610074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of UHPC mixtures using natural zeolite and glass sand as replacements of silica fume and quartz sand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, high percentages were observed for SiO2 (67.01%), CaO (13.76%), and Na2O (9.58%), confirming that the glass residue used is soda-lime-silicate, in addition to being close to the percentages stipulated by Vogel (1994), Shelby (2005, and Bauer (2019) as a soda-lime-silicate glass system. Comparing the quantities of these main oxides with those presented in the studies on UHPC that used the residue as an alternative raw material, a great similarity was observed with the studies by Vaitkevičius, Šerelis and Hilbig (2014), Soliman and Tagnit-Hamou (2016), Soliman and Tagnit-Hamou (2017a), Tagnit-Hamou (2017b), Mosaberpanah, Eren andTarassoly (2019), Pezeshkian, Delnavaz and Delnavaz (2019), Wilson, Soliman, Sorelli and Tagnit-Hamou (2019) and Jiao et al (2020), being an indication of the compatibility with the UHPC systems of the studied glass residue.…”
Section: X-ray Fluorescencesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…As expected, high percentages were observed for SiO2 (67.01%), CaO (13.76%), and Na2O (9.58%), confirming that the glass residue used is soda-lime-silicate, in addition to being close to the percentages stipulated by Vogel (1994), Shelby (2005, and Bauer (2019) as a soda-lime-silicate glass system. Comparing the quantities of these main oxides with those presented in the studies on UHPC that used the residue as an alternative raw material, a great similarity was observed with the studies by Vaitkevičius, Šerelis and Hilbig (2014), Soliman and Tagnit-Hamou (2016), Soliman and Tagnit-Hamou (2017a), Tagnit-Hamou (2017b), Mosaberpanah, Eren andTarassoly (2019), Pezeshkian, Delnavaz and Delnavaz (2019), Wilson, Soliman, Sorelli and Tagnit-Hamou (2019) and Jiao et al (2020), being an indication of the compatibility with the UHPC systems of the studied glass residue.…”
Section: X-ray Fluorescencesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In UHPC mixtures, studies have shown that partially replacing cement (up to 30%) and silica fume (up to 50%) with a natural pozzolan resulted in UHPC specimens with very low (or negligible) chloride ion penetration and drying shrinkage of less than 500 μstrain, whereas workability and mechanical properties of these UHPC mixtures did not substantially change [ 21 , 22 ]. However, the literature reporting the effects of natural pozzolans in non-proprietary UHPC is severely lacking and each of these studies either used aggregates with a maximum size less than 1.2 mm, optimized gradation, or both [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Using ultra-fine aggregates or an optimal gradation increases UHPC production cost which negatively impacts sustainability.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UHPC is a promising material for reinforced concrete structures because it has significant potential for creating new architectural perspectives as well as structural systems with a prolonged service life and low maintenance costs thanks to its superior durability performance [13]. Due to its hydraulic action, high strength activity, and fineness value [14], GGBS may be one of the best alternative cementitious materials for use in UHPC that will allow for a reduction in Portland cement dosage while maintaining satisfactory performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%